|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
I agree we are able to adjust margins to what we see fit. In most cases,
this is simply setting higher standards for selling a large amount of
option premium.
On the other hand, margin debits and bad debts are always a concern no
matter what the financial stability of the firm may be.
-----Original Message-----
From: Stefan Schulz [mailto:prog1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 7:29 AM
To: omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: PFG (broker)
With respect, I beg to differ. There's nothing to stop a broker worried
about exposure to increase customer margins beyond what the exchanges
require - exchanges only set the MINIMUMS they'll accept, no ?
The whole point of probability-based systems like SPAN margining is to
prevent debits in 95%-99% of cases, and a competent risk management
department should be able to figure out what multiplier it needs over
and
above the exchange-mandated minimums to achieve the desired
percentile. Perfection is impossible, but risk management isn't.
If a significant portion of a broker's customer base is sailing so close
to
the wind that margin debits and resulting bad debts are anything like a
concern then I'd be worried about its financial stability, and that
alone
would make me take my business elsewhere.
Regards,
Stefan
At 06:59 18/09/03 -0500, Jeff Gilfillan wrote:
>The exchanges determine margins and are quite generous on that end
>(3-5% on average per contract). Margins unfortunately do not prevent
>debits nor can any risk management department.
|