[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: RE Subject:(01) futures contract rollover issues, (02) optimization


  • To: "Gerald Marisch" <gm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: RE Subject:(01) futures contract rollover issues, (02) optimization
  • From: "Gary Fritz" <fritz@xxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2003 08:39:31 -0700

PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

> I think this "integrity" is important and would be lost if past data
> were "adjusted" for a continuous contract, rendering the data suspect
> for accuracy and thus useless. 

If I remember right you've asked this same question several times 
before, Gerald, and the answer is the same as it was before.  

For YOUR trading style, the "adjusted" prices are apparently 
suspect and useless.  Fine -- don't use them.  But you don't have 
to keep claiming they're useless for ALL trading styles.

> I'm sure there are purposes for a continuous contract, but I fail to
> see them.  

Continuous contracts are ideal for most/many systematic 
approaches that are more interested in continuous (without jumps 
introduced at contract roll) price waveforms than in the specific 
price levels.  My systems work by calculating values based on 
recent price action.  Everything is relative to the recent 
action, so contract-roll jumps throw everything out of whack.  
Absolute price level, however, is irrelevant.  So adjusting the 
price levels to remove the inter-contract jumps is very useful.

Just because you don't see the value doesn't mean it doesn't 
exist.  Many of us find continuous data invaluable.

Gary