|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Just curious. What about CQG anybody use that anymore?
Ron
----- Original Message -----
From: "JHP" <jan4123@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>; "Alex Matulich" <alex@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 1:53 PM
Subject: Re: TS is the "best product on the market"?
> Alex,
>
> There is additional factor Ribau mentioned - our work investment in TS.
> I've been with Omega since the System Writer, investigated dozens of
> programs over the years (Metastock, Ensign, etc.,etc.) and it always
> confirmed my choice. Nowadays, I use the lazy man approach - wait for
> others to come up with something else and let us know their evaluation.
> So far, no enthusiastic messages.
> It takes too much time and effort to evaluate the products yourself.
>
> Jan Philipp
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Alex Matulich" <alex@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 10:23 AM
> Subject: TS is the "best product on the market"?
>
>
> > Jan wrote:
> > >It is disgusting, immoral, etc., but they have the best product on
> > >the market and they know it and we, who're using it, know it too
> > >otherwise we'd have switched to something else long time ago.
> >
> > Do they really have the best product on the market?
> >
> > I don't think I've ever seen a good side-by-side comparison with
> > competing products such as eSignal, or WealthLab, or AmiBroker.
> >
> > I do know that TS (at least TS2ki) has deficiencies that other
> > products don't have; for example, TS doesn't have the ability to
> > optimize on custom-calculated results, and TS can't do anything with
> > portfolios.
> >
> > I'd been interested in trying WealthLab but last I looked, the trial
> > period wasn't sufficient for evaluation, especially since I'm a
> > programmer. I'd only have a chance to look at it over weekends, and
> > there aren't enough weekends in the trial period to get familiar
> > with the software.
> >
> > -Alex
> >
> >
>
>
|