[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

AW: W-L and TS2000i.



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

Milo.

See this is the problem. You can not pick a system randomly and think,
it takes a long time compared to TS. Wealth-Lab Developer comes with
over 600 systems included. Some of them are highly complex and nearly
impossible to code in EL. You might have used a system that was looping
thru your whole portfolio, doing some complex correlation analysis or
creating there own advanced/decline indicator based on some defined
rules. This takes a bit longer then the usual calculations. 

Also you should not forget that WLD is also geared for portfolio
testing, so it is storing the trades for the case that you plan to
change the money management rules. After you run a system on a portfolio
of stocks or futures you can conveniently change the money management
rules and only need to press the "apply" button to find the result very
quickly displayed.

I hope this helps clarifying the difference in speed. 

BTW, the last TS version I used was TS2000i, and I don't think there is
a significant difference of speed in both (WLD and TS) products. 

If you have any further question please let me know.

Regards. 


Volker Knapp
Wealth-Lab Inc.        
www.wealth-lab.de   
www.wealth-lab.com  



-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: David Jennings [mailto:DavidJennings@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 20. März 2003 21:21
An: OmegaList
Betreff: Fw: W-L and TS2000i.




FWIW, I just tested it on > 37000 bars of intra-day and it took a few
seconds to execute.
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Milos" <milos.zeman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "David Jennings" <DavidJennings@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 7:27 PM
> Subject: Re: W-L and TS2000i.
>
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > The code I tried I found here
> >
> > http://www.geocities.com/wealth_lab/Scalper.html
> >
> > I put in it into 1 min ES RTH data from JAN to JUN 02...
> >
> > then I randomly chose any script from menu, the same data and was
waiting
> a
> > long time again and then I knew
> > that in script on line 87 is error....
> >
> > regards
> >
> > Milos