|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
I have been test driving ts6 as well. Not perfect, but thusfar, after a few
weeks, I would take it over esig/2000i, mainly due to no data hassles and
more stable. I should say that I use it as a backup feed though, to
futuresource/ts4. TS6 data has stopped a few times in my time with it. No
warning, just you notice prices aren't updating. There are a variety of
historical data problems with ts6(save those for a later, longer email), but
for real time stuff, it seems fairly respectable.
Chris
----- Original Message -----
From: "TaoOfDow" <TaoOfDow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Ron Cernokus" <roncer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Omega Digest List" <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 6:57 PM
Subject: Re: TS4 to 2000i
> Dear Ron,
>
> OK, I'm going to go out on a limb here.
>
> I thought TS3.5 was the best program TS ever wrote, and I converted to TS4
> reluctantly and by necessity (due to Y2K). Several months ago, following
> many others' suggestions, I converted to TS2Ki, and it went effortlessly.
> Several weeks ago, again largely due to the suggestion of a trader whose
> opinion I especially respect, I test-drove TS6.
>
> OK, here's me on the limb --- I like it and have quit my eSignal datafeed
> (driving my TS2Ki). They're virtually the same price, $100/month plus
> exchange fees, and letting go of keeping up with data collection,
> especially for historic data, is a true convenience.
>
> So bring on your rotten tomatoes, guys --- give me your best shot.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Richard
>
>
>
> Ron Cernokus wrote:
>
> > Omega Traders,
> >
> > I am currently contemplating an up grade from TS4 to 2000i. My data
> > feed is BMI cable - O/S is Win 98se with AMD 1900, 512 DRAM and 40 G
> > 7200 rpm HD. Currently every thing is operating very well but I have
> > the need to be able receive more sophisticated larger code than TS4 is
> > capable of handling. Any opinions or suggestions regarding an upgrade
> > to 2000i would be greatly appreciated as I seem to recall setup can be
> > difficult.
> >
> > Sincere Thanks,
> > Ron
>
|