|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
I have owned both versions of HistoryCentre for over a year and find
them very useful.
They allow a lot of flexibility in the input data format and this
results in the difficult set-up. But once you find the correct setup
for your data, you can keep using that setup without any additional
effort.
I agree that the documentation is not up to the standards we have
come to expect and could be improved. But when I have had problems,
Andrew responds quickly with help. He even built me a modified
version once to handle some weird input format.
But the code works flawlessly. I have used to to build an enormous
OMZ file from a 112 MB ASCII file of continuous contract data. I
think every TS4.0 or TS2000i user should have this tool.
Bob Fulks
At 6:53 AM -0500 10/1/02, Clyde Lee wrote:
>If a program is difficult to setup and use then it is MANDATORY that the
>documentation be excellent and of the type that provides a WALK THROUGH
>approach to setting EACH and EVERY parameter.
>
>To me, if the program has poor documentation and is difficult to setup,
>any amount of criticism that anyone wishes to make of such a product is
>valid and the author should take immediate steps to remedy the documentation
>problem.
>
>Comments above are about this in a prior post:
>
>> Nazarov has done a terrific job here. Yes the DOCUMENTATION IS VERY
>> POOR, yes every setting has to be perfect (but for ANY software to work
|