|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
PO sez:
>( The Safir-X for TS
>cannot be generic and needs a custom install on each
>machine and is rrquested
>if you want to run the Oddball fuzzuy version in TS).
Geez, custom install - - - now it even get's more
complicated ?
--- Pierre Orphelin <sirtrade@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> > -----Message d'origine-----
> > De : Ron Augustine [mailto:RonAug@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>
> > It's fun to watch Pierre go to the end of the
> earth to avoid posting any
> > easily understandable verification of his claims
> for his fuzzy stuff --
> >
>
> It's not funny.
> We cannot provide what you are requesting because we
> would need to provide the
> full version of the software for free, what should
> perfectly know that it is
> impossible for us because of the protection issues (
> The Safir-X runtime for TS
> cannot be generic and needs a custom install on each
> machine and is rrquested
> if you want to run the Oddball fuzzuy version in
> TS).
> The only solution, if you want to verify, is to
> download the evaluation version
> from the web and use your own Oddball files with it
> if you are interested in
> this trivial thing.Then you will be able to verify
> what was in the newsletter if
> you do not believe it, without having TS running,
> and without asking us things
> that we cannot do.
>
> I suppose that you did it with EL Oddbal version,
> because it was easier. So,
> it's more a problem of laziness than ethics. Why not
> do do it with our version
> if you feel it necessary rather than to enforce us
> to give back for free? That
> kind of trap worked until I was 6. After I was
> considering that I was
> considered as an idiot by the counterpart.
> FYI, I'm currently older than 6. Far more.
>
> Your message as well some others, implies that I am
> lying or something close to
> that.
> I provide a way to verify the reality of the proof,
> available for free without
> any risk for us.
> Do not revert the charge of the proof: It's up to
> ther person who claims that
> the proof could be false to bring the proof of the
> so called lie, at least in a
> democraty.
> For what I see, none has done the mandatory
> verification requested. In this
> case, I fear that this thread is of no interest to
> anyone and adds noise for
> nothing.
>
> My purpose was to demonstrate that simple things can
> me improved by complicated
> stuff. I took the Oddball example because I found
> that the success of this 2
> lines system was overevaluated.
> Now you have 4 lines improvements for free available
> on the list, and it seems
> that *for free* is the most important concept,
> without seeing that the
> improvement do not solve the underlying optimisation
> of the ROC level ( the
> intelligence of the disclosed Oddball system relies
> only on 2 level numbers!)
>
> In fact,you have a problem with money itself, what
> quickly turns any clear mind
> into a blind paranoid discussion, where you believe
> to see a velociraptor vendor
> behind anything that could be for sale.
> Unfortunately, I do not sell any Oddball system, I
> just show that better results
> can be achieved with intelligent software. This is
> just an idea , and nothing
> forbids to build your own AI software ( for free) if
> you want to go further in
> this direction.
>
> PO
>
|