|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Ron Augustine [mailto:RonAug@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> It's fun to watch Pierre go to the end of the earth to avoid posting any
> easily understandable verification of his claims for his fuzzy stuff --
>
It's not funny.
We cannot provide what you are requesting because we would need to provide the
full version of the software for free, what should perfectly know that it is
impossible for us because of the protection issues ( The Safir-X runtime for TS
cannot be generic and needs a custom install on each machine and is rrquested
if you want to run the Oddball fuzzuy version in TS).
The only solution, if you want to verify, is to download the evaluation version
from the web and use your own Oddball files with it if you are interested in
this trivial thing.Then you will be able to verify what was in the newsletter if
you do not believe it, without having TS running, and without asking us things
that we cannot do.
I suppose that you did it with EL Oddbal version, because it was easier. So,
it's more a problem of laziness than ethics. Why not do do it with our version
if you feel it necessary rather than to enforce us to give back for free? That
kind of trap worked until I was 6. After I was considering that I was
considered as an idiot by the counterpart.
FYI, I'm currently older than 6. Far more.
Your message as well some others, implies that I am lying or something close to
that.
I provide a way to verify the reality of the proof, available for free without
any risk for us.
Do not revert the charge of the proof: It's up to ther person who claims that
the proof could be false to bring the proof of the so called lie, at least in a
democraty.
For what I see, none has done the mandatory verification requested. In this
case, I fear that this thread is of no interest to anyone and adds noise for
nothing.
My purpose was to demonstrate that simple things can me improved by complicated
stuff. I took the Oddball example because I found that the success of this 2
lines system was overevaluated.
Now you have 4 lines improvements for free available on the list, and it seems
that *for free* is the most important concept, without seeing that the
improvement do not solve the underlying optimisation of the ROC level ( the
intelligence of the disclosed Oddball system relies only on 2 level numbers!)
In fact,you have a problem with money itself, what quickly turns any clear mind
into a blind paranoid discussion, where you believe to see a velociraptor vendor
behind anything that could be for sale.
Unfortunately, I do not sell any Oddball system, I just show that better results
can be achieved with intelligent software. This is just an idea , and nothing
forbids to build your own AI software ( for free) if you want to go further in
this direction.
PO
|