|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
>No hassles, no down periods, etc...
Q's been down for me about 5 minutes in the last year,
and some of that has been net related. Aside from that,
no hassles here either. :-)
FutureSource is a fine product: glad you like it.
BW
>From: Jim Johnson <jejohn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Reply-To: Jim Johnson <jejohn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>To: "Bill Wynne" <tradewynne@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>CC: pfcote@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: Re[2]: Almost afraid to ask
>Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 10:33:29 -0500
>
>Hello Bill,
>
>Go figure. The complaints I've heard have been elsewhere--a few chat
>rooms I've checked etc. That;s why I just stay with FutureSource. No
>hassles, no down periods, etc. for approx addl $150 per month/$7 per
>trading day/ and I get to spend evenings with family, reading etc
>rather than screwing with refresh data etc.
>
>Thursday, February 28, 2002, 10:22:36 AM, you wrote:
>
>
> >>quote.com conitinues to get a lot of complaints
>
>BW> Seems to work OK for some. Beware: there is at least one
>BW> guy using multiple aliases to complain on the Q-list.
>BW> It would seem DS/TS users have lower bandwidth demands
>BW> than pure QCharts users (obviously TS stores its own data,
>BW> Q does not). The DS list has (had :-() very few complaints.
>
> >>and I'd have to use
> >>Dynastore's product. DS is OK but one must maintain two symbol lists.
>
>BW> DS is no longer for sale, but you can export symbol lists from TS to
>DS.
>
>BW> BW
>
>
> >>From: Jim Johnson <jejohn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>Reply-To: Jim Johnson <jejohn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>To: "Paul Cote" <pfcote@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>CC: omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> >>Subject: Re: Almost afraid to ask
> >>Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 08:13:49 -0500
> >>
> >>Hello Paul,
> >>
> >>I use FutureSource sat for my primary (TS4)and am going to go to TS2k
> >>on my seconddary so I've been going over internet data vendors
> >>recently. by process of elimination I've decided on eSignal. Here's
> >>the tortured logic.
> >>
> >>PC Quote/Hyperfeed has no refresh facility and I don't trust
> >>Historybank or omega refresh to be around when I need it. Around
> >>115/month.
> >>
> >>quote.com conitinues to get a lot of complaints and I'd have to use
> >>Dynastore's product. DS is OK but one must maintain two symbol lists.
> >>Also, I don't want a third application if I can avoid it. nothing is
> >>maintenance free. around $89/month.
> >>
> >>eSignal interfaces easily w tS2k, requires no "translator" , can
> >>provide refresh data thru Dynastore's product (120 per year). around
> >>$82/montth (annual plan) + $10/month Dynastore for equities and sp/nd
> >>mini's. addl $50 / month if you want to get all futures.
> >>
> >>there are probably other configs but I don't know them or have ruled
> >>them out in the past bec of cost, complexity. For example, something
> >>call UMDS can work I recall but know little about it. It is not a data
> >>feed itself but may allow you to use other data feeds.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>Wednesday, February 27, 2002, 8:59:24 PM, you wrote:
> >>
> >>PC> Considering the recent discussions about timeliness of the data etc.
> >>PC> I am almost afraid to ask the following question.
> >>
> >>PC> Looking for a "reasonable" real time data provider for TS2000i.
> >>PC> Have used Signal Cable Box, PCQuote over internet before.
> >>
> >>PC> Markets I plan to follow:
> >>PC> S&P Futures(CME) & OEX Options (CBOE) & Indexes
> >>
> >>PC> Limited to internet providers due to location.
> >>
> >>PC> The big question is: Are there data providers who now store
> >>PC> the data and would allow me to immediately catch up with x number
> >>PC> of days of real time data without having to collect during the time
>=
> >>PC> frame?
> >>PC> (Like you get when you chart on a web site?)
> >>
> >>PC> Who would you recommend as reliable and a good value?
> >>
> >>PC> Thanks
> >>PC> Paul
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>--
> >>Best regards,
> >> Jim mailto:jejohn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|