|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Hello ">:-)" and list:
I have not scanned the doctors website as you have,but must agree that
he 'usta' be not only a poster asking questions here,but probably on
MB's "code list".
I am intriqued by the word you used below-ie: "delurks" \does this
perhaps mean that you have coined a new english word describing that the
world knows that TomD is/was a member here,and may accidently post a
private message,-publicly?-every now and then?
Btw,Both are probably excellent TA analysts,with a nod towards td,what
with his purported credentials,and numerous trademarked "TD" stuff,that
may leave another person with Only a Doctorate behind his name,in the
dust... :))
I,for one,"">:-)" <hadrada@xxxxxxxxxxx>",feel that whether using that ID
or another,recognize your very numerous posts to this list,in the
distant past,which Many times included ela code,whether written out or
enclosed in an attached 'ela' file,much as Mark B has done.
>:-)" wrote:
>
> Subject: Ebay 89.12% profitable trades...Dr Clayburg day trading Systems
> I don't have the tools but a quick scan down those webpages raises a lot of
> questions.
>
> 1) If it's a daytrading system, why is it using daily bars (check out the
> system results report)? Why is he showing one minute bars in the GIF files
> while using daily bars in his system calculations? And if he's using a
> system (questionable at best - see below), why not use it on the one minute
> chart so that we can see the actual buy/sell signals instead of
> superimposing all those fine dots and lines?
>
> 2) Why is the largest winning trade $200 while the largest losing trade is
> $975?
>
> 3) Most importantly, why is the average # of bars in winning and losing
> trades 0 (as in ZERO)?
>
> The only conclusion I can draw is that he is using the %Floor trailing stops
> and this should raise a red flag among oldtimers on the list....Speaking of
> this list, since Dr. Clayburg delurks on this list once in a while, perhaps
> he can answer these questions.....
|