|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Gary,
That's the way it looks to me, from my non-IT viewpoint. From my
understanding, the "Home" version will not support dual processors; there
may be some other important issues to look in to, but that ranks highest in
my memory.
I've been running TS2K on the beta release, and, gotta say, it's faster and
more solid than with Win2K, with the normal everyday apps that I use.
Best to all,
Kimball Morgan
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gary Fritz" <fritz@xxxxxxxx>
To: <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 3:24 PM
Subject: Re: Windows XP for TS
> > Microsoft already said about "we take the best from Windows Me"
> > the conclusion is:
> > The difference is the same as with Win95/98/Me vs Win2000/NT.
>
> I'd be very surprised if they did that. Win9x/Me is a pretty
> frontend on top of DOS. Win2k/NT is a 32bit OS without an underlying
> DOS system. They're totally different systems. Win2k -> XP is
> supposed to be the "end of the road" for those two separate OS's --
> they were supposed to be merged together for all future releases.
>
> I'd guess the Home version will have a few more toys and eye-candy
> features than Pro, but the underlying OS will be identical.
>
> Gary
>
>
|