[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Re[2]: The Usual Suspects - Violence is the litmus test for the first amendment


  • To: fritz@xxxxxxxx
  • Subject: Re: Re[2]: The Usual Suspects - Violence is the litmus test for the first amendment
  • From: Ullrich Fischer <uf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2001 15:27:53 -0700

PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

True, but the line in the sand must still be violence.  It is too easy to 
slip from prohibiting Falwell's polemics to prohibiting anything but the 
most politically correct of public expression.

Has anyone made a T-Shirt yet with the word "Infidel" on it in large block 
letters yet?    I would wear one. :)

At 9/14/2001 04:18 PM, you wrote:
> > groups, like America's Taliban: Falwell, Roberson and the 700
> > club, which confine their activities to odious rhetoric should be
> > protected by the first amendment as always.  Those like the
> > various militias, who accumulate arms and set up armed camps,
> > should be eliminated by any means necessary.
>
>Of course, the Talibans of the world are the ones who inflame and
>motivate the militias...  without their odious rhetoric, there would
>be far fewer zealots ready to take up arms against the infidels.
>
>Gary