|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Do not think I have lost money due to the bug, since it normally only
affects what happens with a number of bars. But it might make it harder to
find working patterns since DMI (amongst others) comes out different
compared to what it should become.
I did not understand plot2 being lower than plot1 in TS PRO. Plot1 is fixed,
so it is as I expected the same bug in TS PRO if plot1 plots the same on
both of them.
But plot2, how can it differ? The part included does not contain any
accumulator, that comes later in the original code. Could it be that you are
looking at different dates or got different scales? The plot2 value is just
a difference between highs (mainly) and should return the same values in
both versions.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jack Griffin [mailto:jack_2231@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: den 16 juli 2001 22:25
> To: Bengtsson, Mats; Eskimo Omega List
> Subject: Re: I think I have to change my opinion from bad
> precision to buggy c alculations
>
>
> > bug? What happened was
> > that I got funny results during backtests, so I
> > started tracking what
> > happened. I knew that price conversion to integers
>
> Mats, I ran your code on TS Pro (build 2/23/2001) and
> 2000i. I got different results. Namely, plot2 was
> lower in TS Pro by a factor of 1.566. So if what you
> are saying is true, the bug probably hasn't yet been
> fixed.
>
> I hope you didn't lose too much capital due to the
> bug.
>
> Jack
>
>
>
This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential and is the property of the Cap Gemini Ernst & Young Group. It is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute, or use this message or any part thereof. If you receive this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies of this message.
|