|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
>The first 1 minute
bar should be 9:30, not 9:31.<
Jack:
Well, these kind of different time stamps between
vendors have been around since I first looked at
1 minute charts about 15 years ago: good luck!
And good luck with your 12,000% a year system too,
although you shouldn't need it.
BW
>From: Jack Griffin <jack_2231@xxxxxxxxx>
>To: DH <catapult@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Omega List <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: Re: Warning: all historybank.com data seems stamped 1 minute late.
>Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 10:48:59 -0700 (PDT)
>
>--- DH <catapult@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > Their 09:31am bars, for
> > > instance, seem to reveal what happened between
> > > 09:30:00 and 09:30:59.
> >
> > TS (and many other programs) has always been that
> > way. It's working
> > exactly like it's supposed to. There isn't any
> > "correct" way to note bar
> > times and the only "fault" is yours for not
> > realizing it sooner.
> >
> > RTFM..... :-)
>
>But it should be consistent at least. Consider daily
>bars ... pull up your daily chart on the s&p. Notice
>that huge blip on January 4th 2000? No? You thought
>'reamspan cut rates on January 3rd 2000? Well he did,
>but with their method it should show up on the 4th.
>See my point? If the market crashes on a Friday I
>don't want it showing up on Monday's bar. Moving back
>to faster time scales ... if you want to be consistent
>you should use the start time. . The first 1 minute
>bar should be 9:30, not 9:31. That is how qcharts and
>the rest of the world does it and that is the right
>way imo. The last bar should be 15:59. I think TS
>got it wrong. And I think we need to get them to fix
>it before sp6 (the final sp) is frozen. Until then,
>what happened to me could happen to anyone testing
>fast systems.
>
>Jack
>
>
|