|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
John should be sent to "traders purgatory"; a place where they take HALF of
the winner's profits and you get to keep the other half (and the losses).
After he is made pure by the experience, he can return "to the fold" and
gets to keep all of his profits.
(Heck, it's better than "trader's hell" where they take ALL of your winner's
profits and you end-up with nothing but losers !)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robert Marley [mailto:smokegreenbuds@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 8:32 AM
> To: OmegaList
> Subject: Re: Wrong again Marko!
>
>
> Sorry, but Mark Brown speaks the truth here.. For too
> long TASC has said what its advertisers paid them to
> say. TASC was never interested in the truth. I have
> had multiple letters-to-the editor rejected simply
> because my comments conflicted with article content (I
> was right and the article content was wrong, but TASC
> would not hear it).
>
> -RNM
>
>
>
> --- Thomas Alexander <alexander_enterprises@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> > Whoa Nellie! Re-leash the dogs of war. Lassie's gone
> > over
> > to the Dark Side of the Force.
> >
> > Other than a few hardcore emails I have written in
> > my less
> > than glorious past, I would say this is one of the
> > most
> > acerbic emails I've read. While I appreciate your
> > candor,
> > straightforwardness and efforts, the angry, negative
> > tone
> > and lack of substantiation and detail was painful
> > and
> > detracted from the value of your input in my
> > reading.
> >
> > I must be very green indeed to still enjoy reading
> > TASC,
> > Active Trader and Futures magazines. And though I
> > was born
> > at night, it was not last night so I know to take
> > what I
> > read with a grain of salt. (I was a writer/content
> > provider/marketing copy person and salt merchant for
> > years
> > myself.) Yet, what you are suggesting sounds more
> > like a
> > Gobi-desert-salt-flats conspiracy than a "grain of
> > salt."
> >
> > Keeping gentle-flower newbies like myself in mind,
> > would
> > you be so kind as to provide informative and helpful
> > details of what you are talking about, sans the
> > photon
> > torpedoes and unsolicited kidney extractions :)
> >
> > I don't mean to stir up trouble but I just know that
> > in all
> > of that vendetta you are trying to be helpful and I
> > always
> > appreciate the help!
> >
> > Thank you Mark for your input and thank you John for
> > not
> > calling in Charlie's Angels to kick some trader
> > bootie :)
> >
> > Thomas "The Smiling Buddhist Softy with a Pony Tail"
> > Alexander
> >
> > --- Mark Brown <markbrown@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > Hello John,
> > >
> > > i was wondering why "NOW" you would come out
> > of the
> > > closet and say
> > > something about your former meal ticket "omega
> > and or
> > > billy cruz".
> > > after looking at some of the stock and commodities
> > > magazines that keep
> > > piling up in the corner of my office (from my
> > paid
> > > subscription) i
> > > decided to dust one off and have a look. now
> > guess
> > > what? no cruz
> > > advertising of any kind? i see no wonder you
> > have
> > > pulled your head
> > > out of the sand or where ever else it was stuck.
> > >
> > > i see some brilliant new magazine has now
> > taken s&c's
> > > place as the
> > > premier trading resource. i guess those
> > that try
> > > and be more
> > > ethical win out in the end, it just takes time and
> > your
> > > magazines time
> > > has come.
> > >
> > > you have the guts to ask for new articles and
> > trading
> > > systems in your
> > > feb. 2001 - Opening Position on page 6! i have
> > done
> > > more for you rag
> > > just now by posting this that all your paid
> > advertisers
> > > combined.
> > >
> > > in fact you have just lit a fire under me to
> > write more
> > > articles for
> > > that other magazine that is kicking your butt all
> > the way
> > > to the bank.
> > > what sunk your mag was your lack of morals
> > when it
> > > came to selling
> > > your subscribers down the river. you crossed
> > the
> > > line and now you
> > > have burnt your bridge with your clients on
> > it. the
> > > only reason i
> > > still take your mag is to witness its further
> > decay.
> > > maybe you could
> > > get all those celebrities you and omega created in
> > the
> > > past like
> > > Tom DaFake, Linda Lovelace, Jake Snake, Joe
> > > Krustyfinger, Mark Crook
> > > and others. not to mention the guy "i
> > wrote the
> > > book on market
> > > wizards" and therefore i are one now. yea
> > right.
> > > maybe these folks
> > > could now chip in and bail you out.
> > >
> > > JSSC> Wrong again, Marko! We never review
> > something until
> > > it's been released.
> > >
> > > evidently even after it was released, the reviews
> > were
> > > better
> > > according to the vendors advertising size and
> > commitment.
> > > rather than
> > > if the product was any good or not.
> > >
> > > you know for a fact that your whole staff refused
> > to put
> > > their name or
> > > names on the ts2000i review when it first came
> > out.
> > > why? because
> > > they were paid to lie, thats why. you are still
> > being
> > > paid to lie.
> > >
> > > look at the robert krause saga in s&c. the
> > magazine
> > > practically was
> > > owned by him for a while and even tom hartle
> > declared
> > > that krause was
> > > his guru and mentor! everywhere you looked it was
> > krause
> > > this and
> > > krause that. and low (very low) and behold tom
> > winds
> > > up leaving his
> > > position as editor (head misleader) and goes to
> > work for
> > > krause.
> > >
> > > wonder who we will see heavily promoted in s&c
> > soon
> > > in the future?
> > > you can bet whoever they are its your future
> > employer.
> > >
> > > JSSC> jj
> > >
> > > Have a Great Day, Mark
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
|