[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: ??? developing or purchasing a system



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

I may understand your position, but the way we go is the opposite.
We do not believe that such a simple tool will be of practical interest
 theoretical: yes) fuzzy logic approach needs some fine tuning, what we do
in the Safir-X software.
Coding a FL toolbox for TS is going back  5 years for us, and more, we use
neurofuzzy logic, not fuzzy logic alone, for various reasons , among them
generalization and stability.

Adding a FL toolbox to TS will bring more complexity to system development,
if you want to mix this with pure EL code.
I do not want to speak of the development and trial and error testing time,
we speak days or  weeks, not minutes, like it is the case with the
standalone application.

If I had to demonstrate the validity of the approach, I would certainly not
propose such a tool, because our experience showed ( with the early version,
5 years ago) that this kind of approach was time consuming and discouraging
for the end user.
Rather post realtime result, what I will do next month.

The way we go is to the other side , with even more complex software that
will automate the full process of not only setting  buy sell neurofuzzy
rules, but also decide if you use stop or limit orders, add or decrease the
number of contracts,  go flat, all of this being done with neurofuzzy rules,
100 % automated research and multi criterion training, all of this with
portfolio capabilities.

This will be the next Safir-X Professional version scheduled for Q4 2001,
targeted to institutional ( price will be too).

Then you may understand why we do not have any interest to code a FL DLL for
TS, a matter of time, of intellectual interest( that I would have had 6
years ago), and frankly the neat impression that we are doing what should be
done in the neurofuzzy approach for trading systems development, even if we
are not the best of the best ( we are not).

Thisis the reason  why we cannot do this now, and do not want to support a
technique that is difficult to use without the help of a specialized
software, what a  TS DLL is not.

Sincerely,

Pierre Orphelin
www.sirtrade.com
TradeStation Technologies representative in France




> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Bilo Selhi [mailto:biloselhi@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> Envoyé : mardi 29 mai 2001 21:38
> À : pierre.orphelin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Omega List
> Objet : Re: ??? developing or purchasing a system
>
>
> actually Pierre,
> the best thing you can probably do for all of us on the list
> since you are the expert in FL field
> is to code a generic FL dll implemented toolbox.
> it has to be purely generic ie. simplified functions
> such as normalize, fuzzify, infer, defuzzify and that's about it...
> this would greatly improve the rule based only TS approach...
> why not do that and capitalize on that instead of getting
> into real complex stuff that only a handful will buy???
> you can pick up the Earl Cox book ( i can mail you one if you want )
> at amazon it has most of the code you need on the CD in there.
> simplify it, compile it into a DLL and dump it on the market
> for $300 bucks or something like that... many will thank you
> for that i am sure.
> on top of that  rule based system can be improved by 50-100%
> if utilizing even simple FL with the right approach.
> if you get the dll done i can demonstrate the right approach to
> you and to the list...
> i hope you understand.
> bilo.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "pierre.orphelin" <pierre.orphelin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "Omega List" <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 2:06 PM
> Subject: RE: ??? developing or purchasing a system
>
>
> > Could you explain ?
> >
> > Pierre Orphelin
> > www.sirtrade.com
> > TradeStation Technologies representative in France
> >
> >
> > > -----Message d'origine-----
> > > De : Mark Brown [mailto:markbrown@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > > Envoyé : mardi 29 mai 2001 18:53
> > > À : Omega List
> > > Objet : ??? developing or purchasing a system
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ps  i  already  warned  them that anyone who was a vendor replying in
> > <============?????
> > > private  was  most  likely  a  scammer  who  wanted  to get into their
> > > pockets. so if your such a legitimate vendor, you won't mind answering
> > > and   or   responding   in  public i would think?  of course watch out
> > > for anything fuzzy. be nice now i am..
> > >
> > >
> > > Have Great Day,  Mark Brown
> > > orgies organized
> > > rebellions quailed
> > > bs 2000 support
> > > fuzzy stuff vacuumed <=================???????????
> > > wedding cakes
> > > planets aligned
> > > anything else to make a buck, almost.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>