[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

AW: need some ideas to (dis)prove an assumption



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

Colin,

to reiterate, this collar strategy of yours can be mildly described as
suboptimal.

Suppose you were about to buy a lottery ticket for the price of $ 5,000. How
would you like it if you learned that you could buy a ticket with precisely
the same risk/reward profile, same expiration, same odds, same potential
profit, same everything, for the price of only $ 500?

You can do exactly that in your collar strategy. As I had tried to point out
in a previous post, a collar is useful only if you *already* own some stock,
and want to protect it against a temporary market decline. Buying this stock
merely for the purpose of establishing a collar is amateurish and an
unnecessary expenditure. It is much cheaper to establish a vertical spread
which can be constructed to be *exactly* equivalent to the collar at a
fraction of the cost.

To illustrate, let us do your APC (Anadarko Petroleum) example at Friday's
closing prices. A collar could have been established by buying 100 APC,
selling 1 June 65 call, and buying 1 June 55 put, at a cost of about $
6,200.

However, you could have done an *exactly* equivalent position by selling 1
June 65 call and buying 1 June 55 call, at a cost of about $ 650.

Don't you think this difference might be worthy of your consideration?

Best wishes,

Michael Suesserott