[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: PORTING TRADESTATION TO MATLAB



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links


I started out with symbolic math using Mathematica on
NeXTStep hardware and found myself becoming more of a
Mathematica "programmer" than a Mathematica "user".

Powerful, but demanding of my time and I couldn't afford
the commitment.

I suspect that current versions of Mathematica are also
much more expensive than the alternatives.

-- John


-----Original Message-----
From: MikeSuesserott [mailto:MikeSuesserott@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2001 11:36 AM
To: Bilo Selhi
Cc: omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: PORTING TRADESTATION TO MATLAB


Hi Bilo,

you wrote:

   >>"i reiterate that matlab or mathcad (s-plus )
   >>are the best math/engineering
   >>platforms available. nothing can
   >>beat those now just as nothing can beat TS
   >>as far as system development."

Not to start any war, but that sweeping statement is perhaps a bit
overenthusiastic. Don't forget Mathematica which is much more powerful than
either of these two packages. You can find a brief comparison at these
University of Colorado websites:

http://amath.colorado.edu/computing/mmm/brief.html
http://amath.colorado.edu/computing/mmm/index.html

Best wishes,

Michael Suesserott