[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Tillman Moving Average, T3-"Jurik shows it comes the closest to JMA"



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

Could we stop discussing analysis tools and techniques and please return to 
bitching about Omega please? All this thoughtful talk occupies my time to 
read it!

;)

Tounge-in-cheekingly-yours,
Mike

At 12:30 PM 3/21/2001 -0700, Gary Fritz wrote:
> > Baloney....T3 is very slow reacting.......HIGH LAG !
>
>Not true.
>
> > The lookback length must be approximately HALF of that of the one
> > used in a JMA plot to come even close.
>
>That's because the "length" inputs do not mean the same thing on the
>two functions.  With the same inputs T3 has more lag than JMA, but
>that's because it's smoothing a lot more.  Set them to whatever
>lengths it takes to get about the same lag, and you'll see they are
>very comparable.  Filters like this are a lag/noise tradeoff; with
>less lag you get more noise, with less noise you get more lag.  With
>the same lag the two averages have about the same amount of noise.
>
>Tim Tillson (not Tillman) is a friend of mine -- I've known him for
>over 20 years.  I've also spoken to Mark Jurik about T3, and listened
>in when the two of them had some pretty interesting (& deep!)
>discussions at a recent MTA meeting.  (It was the first time they'd
>met face-to-face, in spite of years of friendly rivalry.)  Mark
>freely admits that T3 blew the doors off his previous version of his