|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
I totally concur here.....it is a HUGE can of worms........I tried it and
gave up in disgust....
notably Omega never posted a code conversion/upgrade "checklist" or "gotcha
list" !!
For complex multi-function coding that employes arrays, etc.
TS2000i is so far superior to TS4, it's analogous to Win2000 vs. Windows
3.1.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John F. Berentson [mailto:jberentson@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2001 11:23 PM
> To: Steve Kline; omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: Please help me before I do the unthinkable!
>
>
> Steve-
>
> Proceed with great caution. I had some difficulty moving systems
> and indicators over because of changes in Easy Language. After I
> used it for a month, I went back to TS4. Of course, a lot of the
> standard indicators had been written over by the TS2K version and
> were now unreadable in TS4. Try opening the TS2K version of an
> ADX in TS4. Can't be done.
>
> Why did I go back? Instability of TS2K; different key strokes and
> mouse clicks for ingrained tasks; ten other reasons that having
> made my decision to go back to TS4 I promptly forgot.
>
> You should be aware that a program which permits TS4 to operate
> with eSignal is in beta testing. If you must switch data suppliers, I
> suggest you try the Dynastore/Quote.com combo with TS4 in the
> interim rather than go with TS2K unless you have a problem with
> the data point limitations of TS4.
>
>
> On 20 Mar 2001, at 19:40, Steve Kline wrote:
>
> > Actually, in all seriousness, I'm thinking of "upgrading" from TS4 to
> > TS2000i. The reasons are mainly due to my data provider, BMI,
> going to hell
> > in a handbasket. I'll prolly go Esignal.
> >
> > Anyway, I'm on a PIII500 WIN98 256RAM machine, and wondering if the
> > conversion from TS4 to TS2000i (whatever service pack they're
> up to) is a
> > smooth one (data conversion, study conversion, and how 2000i
> runs these days
> > real time, and workspace conversion).
> >
> > If anyone wishes to offer any suggestions or comments on this
> subject I'd
> > really appreciate the input.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
>
>
> JFB
> NYC
>
|