[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: e-mini brokers / platforms and more



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

In a message dated 1/20/01 4:13:58 PM Central Standard Time, 
prosys@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:

<< I might give www.5perside.com a shot.....currently I'm with 
www.jackcarl.com
 Bugs in their browser-based trading platform make for unpleasant surprises.
 Low commissions and daytrading margins are pluses.... >>

***** Actually, 5perside.com is owned by ED&F Man International, Inc., the 
same firm that owns Jack Carl.  I believe 5perside was created by First 
American Discount Corp., which was recently bought by ED&F Man.  And, I think 
5perside uses the Futures Online platform that First American had leased when 
they were trying to merge with LFG, Lind Waldock and Saul Stone.  Futures 
Online was a Division of LFG (and now owned by Refco)  and there interface 
was developed internally at LFG.  Theoretically, 5perside should have the 
same margin policy as Jack Carl.

***** Both the Jack Carl browser based interface, and the 5perside/Futures 
Online platform, are examples of internally produced systems.  However, Jack 
Carl's ETC browser system originally bought the rights to its front end from 
another firm, Auditrack.  And coincidentally, First American deployed 
Autitrack's system previously to the Futures Online deal.

***** By way of disclosure, I run an electronic trading operation that clears 
through ED&F Man and I used to work for First American way back in the Reagan 
years, so take my words with that knowledge.

***** These first generation trading platforms will probably be replaced by 
private labeled versions of Independent Software Vendors ("ISV") systems in 
the not too distant future.  I believe brokerage firms are going to find it 
increasingly difficult to technologically keep up with the ISVs.  The firm 
that can put together the best combination of tools to trade all the markets 
on one screen, capturing order flow across exchange and market sectors, and 
provide the best customer experience will be the winning formula.  Refco 
seems to be in the hunt for capturing as much retail and local order flow as 
possible with all of their acquisitions (Lind Waldock, LFG, parts of 
Rosenthal Collins Taiwan, and the local traders futures business of First 
Options of Chicago.)

***** The name 5perside is catchy and exploits the low dollar commission rate 
that appeals to our desire for minimal costs.  However, there are cheaper 
rates available from Interactive Brokers ("IB").  While IB offers low cost 
commission rates, their objective does not seem to be to just build market 
share by accepting lower profit margins.  They have a low expense operation 
which matches their low price.  5perside actually matched First American's 
initial strategy of building market share by offering a low price.  First 
American entered the discount commodity brokerage business at $16 per round 
turn back in the early 1980s when other discounters were charging closer to 
$30. 

***** Ultimately it is a question of finding the best functionality, service 
and price, which equals value.  Bad functionality at a low price is not a 
good value.  Good functionality at a low price, but with bad service is not a 
good value either.  This is not to say any of the firms I mentioned, or mine, 
offer one of these combinations.  It is up to each trader to come to those 
conclusions themselves, based on their experience and needs.

***** There is an X factor which is going to change a lot of things.  That X 
factor is Single Stock Futures, which were recently approved in the U.S. and 
will start trading in a year in the U.S. and this month in the UK.  Think 
back to what the New York Stock Exchange was before the introduction of stock 
index futures.  Look at the weekly statistics from the NYSE that Program 
Trading makes up 20 to 25% of its weekly volume.  The largest single source 
of volume to the NYSE, according to a knowledgeable industry insider, is the 
CBOE.  Would it not be easier for CBOE traders to lay off their trades on SSF 
executed through the CBOE, CBOT or CME rather than the morass that is the way 
stocks are traded.  A single order book, with real time prices from a single 
source.  Margining in the same clearing organization (and the Chicago Board 
of Trade Clearing Corp. and the Option Clearing Corp. are talking merger).  
SSF could become the leading indicator for individual share prices just 
because of the time lag in the way some stock trades are routed and reported. 
 Emini prices are mostly a much better indicator of the S&P market than the 
big pit traded ones, just because the prices get out faster electronically.

***** The systems that will be needed to handle the trading that 
professionals and the retail public will want to do will not be the first 
generation trading platforms developed internally by futures brokerage firms 
in the 1990s.  The changes are coming soon and there will be some bumps along 
the way for many firms and traders.  

Regards,

John J. Lothian

Disclosure: Futures trading involves financial risk, lots of it!  John J. 
Lothian is the President of the Electronic Trading Division of The Price 
Futures Group, Inc., an Introducing Broker.