[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: the Fed


  • To: "Mark Brown" <scheier@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: the Fed
  • From: "Jack Zaner" <jz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2001 11:24:23 -0800
  • In-reply-to: <3A5372F0.12C79AE@erols.com>

PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

Scheier:  Perhaps Mr. Greenspan simply forgot your phone number.  How rude
of him. :-)
Regards, Jack.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Brown" <markbrown@markbrown.com>
To: "scheier" <scheier@erols.com>
Cc: "Omega Users List" <omega-list@eskimo.com>
Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2001 12:46 PM
Subject: Re: the Fed


> Hello  scheier,
>
> what you don't understand is that the market told you what would
> happen BEFORE IT HAPPENED you were just not listening..
>
> s> I'm very lucky to be able to say I wasn't short the emini
> s> nasdaq when this Fed announcement came out, but that was
> s> by pure luck, as I was short twice on the way down for
> s> moderate profits in what I thought was a normal day.  In my
> s> opinion, there is no excuse for the Fed to treat the market
> s> and its participants in different manner for potentially bullish
> s> news as it does for bearish.  The right way for the Fed to behave
> s> for such dramatic reversals of policy is giving small hints.  This
> s> intentional surprise treats such participants like market makers,
> s> floor speculators, and specialists--who by nature must take short
> s> positions as part of their daily role-- as if they were second class.
>
> s> I have previously held Mr. Greenspan in fairly high regard, but
> s> must reconsider my opinion.   This is an example of the Fed
> s> playing god.  That's not its role.   It's role is to tweak.  It's
manner
> s> should be humble.   In this action, it places itself above the private
> s> sector as if the corporate world of equity ownership were subservient
> s> to the Fed's control.   This is the ultimate disrespect.   Some have
> s> said they thought Mr. Greenspan should have gone some months ago
> s> because of his lagging actions to leading indicators of a lagging
> s> economy.   I say he was doing exactly what he should have been
> s> doing at that time.   Now I find myself on the opposite side of
> s> their opinions again.  As they love him for his actions today, I
> s> despise him for the thoughtless and even arrogant way in which
> s> he has superseded his role.
>
> s> Scheier
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
>   Mark Brown   mailto:markbrown@markbrown.com
>   Y = Offset + Amplitude * sin(Frequency * X)
>
>
>
>