|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Could have been the way I was trading them. Before I traded using BW system
I backtested to see if it worked. Made money on the Naz, lost money on those
others I mentioned - AD, CC, KC. Could have been the way they "set-up" in
the system. But it seems that these spiked me out and lost money over two to
four years of backtesting. Naz may have spiked, but was probably in
direction of my trade. Interesting point. I will go back and look this
coming weekend and let you know. Again, did backtesting on EOD basis in
Dynamic Trader software.
Brian G
----- Original Message -----
From: Bill Wynne <tradewynne@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <babakid@xxxxxxxxxxx>; <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <webinquery@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, November 12, 2000 2:31 PM
Subject: Re: Bill Williams system
> >From: "Brian/Louise Garnant" <babakid@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >To: <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >CC: <webinquery@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >Subject: Bill Williams system
> >Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2000 13:11:20 -0500
> >It is
> >a very simple system - to answer about the other indexes - works well on
> >Nazdaq and incidentally, there are much more volatile commodities than
> >either the Naz or the S&P: coffee, cocoa, Australian Dollar to name three
> >that immediately occur to me....
>
> Brian:
>
> Although coffee has its spikes, the idea that the OZZY, coffee, or cocoa
are
> more volatile than the Nasdogs, is just not true. The NDX has rallied
1300%+
> off the 1994 low, and has had four 40%+ swings just this year (so far).
The
> last time Cocoa went wild was in the 70's, and even that mania does not
> match this one in the NDX.
>
> Any way you slice it the Nasdaq 100 is the big dog right now.
>
> Bill Wynne
>
|