|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Hello Alex,
AA> So, I'd appreciate some feedback on my question.
AA> Alex.
i would defiantly NOT belive ANYTHING that Futures Truth puts out.
They have flat out misrepresented systems in the past such as
Aberration and Catscan - specifically failing to disclosed that the
developers of these systems curve fitted to keep ranking up and yet
this was not fully disclosed.
what gets me in this business is that people have hard time from
separating a good feeling that they have personally for someone with
how their stuff performs. many people like larry williams and i'm
sure he a charismatic type guy so what does the stuff work and hold up?
tom demark is an impressionable guy and george lane and on and on
name a million of them here.
this is a black and white numbers game - either it works or it doesn't.
i have many systems that i feel are very tradable and will hold up
over the long term - what usually blows up is the traders willingness
to stick with it. that willingness is directly correlated with how
thorough a trader understands what it is they are doing and how they
are employing that system/ method ect. it takes years and years of
hard work to even understand yourself and many never get it. in fact
most never will get it - it takes an inverse thinker to trade the
markets with long term success, and most models are focused on
pleasing the short term objectives of "the public".
i guess what many people are after is who makes me feel the best and
special? and thats usually NOT what makes money.
we can discuss all the models you want name some..
--
Best regards,
Mark Brown mailto:markbrown@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Y = Offset + Amplitude * sin(Frequency * X)
|