|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
It is another way to construct and. compare two MAs. Then we go with
the flow, or try to really understand something.
I understand that we could derive meaning from simple indicators, maybe
partially based on how we connect them in our forebrains, but we need a
unique view of the markets to bring us an edge.
Public opinion (whether regarding estate planning or the value of
indicators) is based solely on ignorance. But mere ignorance is not
enough of a guide.
Well....enoughg from me tonight hahahahahah
Regards,
Monte
cb wrote:
>
> Some time ago, I convinced myself that on the free quote.com charts they
> were plotting the fast K as the "fast" line and the slow D as the
> "slower" line. That's an unusual combination I think.
>
> If I'm not mistaken normally the fast stochastic indicator plots the raw
> (unsmoothed) value as the fast line and a 3 day avg of that is the other
> smoother line, referred to as fastD.
>
> The slow stoch. indicator plots the latter once smoothed line (sometimes
> now called slowK just to confuse things, but it's the same as fastD I
> think), and then a still smoother line that is the 3 day average of the
> slowK; this last line is slowD. You don't normally see fastK with
> slowD, but I believe that's what quote.com did. (Whether Qcharts is the
> same, I don't know.) I think I verified this theory by comparing some
> numbers from quote.com and TS.
>
> Conrad Bowers
>
> Ron wrote:
> >
> > Can someone please post the original fast stochastic formula ela. I am
> > trying to match the Qchart stochastic to Tradestation and they are very
> > different for the same input values. I have been told the following by
> > Qcharts list:
> >
> > "QCharts may be averaging the num and denom separately vs. averaging
> > num/denom. MetaStock does the former and TS once did the latter "
> >
> > I would appriciate any input on this. I have no idea why they are so
> > different. Both have the same lenght and both are fast stochastic. How many
> > different versions are there and which one is better?
> >
> > Thanks for the help
> >
> > Ron
|