Fw: Stochastic

["Ron" <ron560@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

 Thanks for the reply.

I already have this . This is not what I was after. I need to know why there
 is such a huge difference in %K values for only some bars between TS and
Qcharts stochastic. The %D is different on all the bars. This is very
strange. I prefer the Qcharts version and I am desperatly trying to duplicte
it in TS. So if anyone has the Qcharts version of stochastic in TS I would
appriciate the help.

 I think the Metastock version is also different from TS. ANyone has the ela
 for that?

 Thanks



> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "JeRRyWar" <drwar@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "'Ron'" <ron560@xxxxxxxxxxx>; "'Omega List'" <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Monday, July 10, 2000 2:43 PM
> Subject: RE: Stochastic
>
>
> > {*******************************************************************
> > Description: Fast Stochastic %K
> > Provided By: Omega Research, Inc. (c) Copyright 1999
> > ********************************************************************}
> >
> > Inputs: Length(NumericSimple);
> >
> > Value1 = Lowest(Low, Length);
> > Value2 = Highest(High, Length) - Value1;
> > Value3 = Close;
> >
> > If Value2 > 0 Then
> > FastK = (Value3 - Value1) / Value2 * 100
> > Else
> > FastK = 0;
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ron [mailto:ron560@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> > Sent: Monday, July 10, 2000 2:18 PM
> > To: Omega List
> > Subject: Stochastic
> >
> >
> > Can someone please post the original fast stochastic formula ela. I am
> > trying to match the Qchart stochastic to Tradestation and they are very
> > different for the same input values. I have been told the following by
> > Qcharts list:
> >
> > "QCharts may be averaging the num and denom separately vs. averaging
> > num/denom. MetaStock does the former and TS once did the latter "
> >
> > I would appriciate any input on this. I have no idea why they are so
> > different. Both have the same lenght and both are fast stochastic. How
> many
> > different versions are there and which one is better?
> >
> > Thanks for the help
> >
> > Ron
> >
> >
>