|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
I just said - according to the time of the chat transcripts - that she simply
made comments onto a non-existent data report giving her comment at evident
wrong time (8:32:39 "napm number out having a slightly pos effect in the
bond-os") and when it was the right moment (at about 10.00) she did not write
any comment regarding the clearly NAPM bullish report , jut said "10:03:15 SPs
close the gap area," and good six minutes later: 10:06:37 "new highs on s adn
ps and dogs".
Alberto
"M. Simms" wrote:
> I don't quite get it....
> you saying she "rigged" the comments by using a bogus time stamp or what ?
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: trader [mailto:trader_wiz@xxxxxx]
> > Sent: Saturday, June 10, 2000 4:47 AM
> > To: omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: Re: Linda Raschke's chatroom
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > Subject: Linda Raschke's chatroom
> > > Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2000 08:44:23 -0500
> > > From: "M. Simms" <prosys@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > To: "Omega-List" <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > Check it out....$350 per month to join !
> > >
> > > http://www.mtrader.com/linda.htm
> > >
> > > Maybe the cost is high due to lower profits from trading ?
> >
> > The problem could be another....
> > Here is what's I wrote to Victoria - Linda partners in the chat
> > after the free trial access last June 1:
> >
> > > Yesterday at about 8.30 EST you and Linda wrote in the Chat Room:
> > >
> > >
> > > > 08:29:17 now it has met its minimum objective lelve....
> > > > 8:28:21 level
> > > > 08:29:41 NAPM number comes out shortly here.
> > > > 08:30:09 Eurodollars put in a higher low on the daily
> > charts yesterday
> > > > 08:30:45 short end of the curve had been the weakest...
> > > > 8:32:08 9526 was the yest high in bonds
> > > > 8:32:39 napm number out having a slightly pos effect in
> > the bond-os
> > > >
> > > How did you ( and Linda was waiting the number...) make a comment on
> > > T-bond reaction to the numbers if the NAPM report came out about 1 hour
> > > and half later? (as usual at 10.00/01 EST)....;-)
> > >
> > > Obviously no comment on the bullish data at the right time:...
> > >
> > >
> > > > 9:58:24 30 min grail buy gets its objective in the 1st
> > 25 minutes
> > > > 9:58:40 the setup was there but we did not buy on
> > yesterdays close
> > > > 9:58:54 the market did what it was supposed to do
> > > > 9:59:06 every once in a while it behaves itself
> > > > 10:02:05 Gas openes around unchanged...gave a whiplash
> > sell yesterday, a selling climax at the top.
> > > > 10:03:00 Euros....
> > > > 10:03:15 SPs close the gap area,
> > > > 10:04:07 OK...that weekly chart of the bonds is
> > definately kicking in!
> > > > 10:05:02 nasdogs still have not broken yesterdays high
> > > > 10:05:04 trying it here
> > > > 10:06:12 there they go
> > > > 10:06:37 new highs on s adn ps and dogs
> > > >
> > >
> > > ...even if the main index were at highs.
> > >
> > > Any comment, please?
> > > People pay $350.00 not for "autopilot comments" but for real
> > > comments even when You and Linda make a mistake.
> > > Anyone (even a "market wizard") can forget to remember that a main
> > > report has been scheduled at 10.00 instead of 8.30 EST - OK -
> > but please no
> > > fantasies on reaction to the..... "ghost numbers".... these comments
> > > devaluate your work on the chat tremendously....;-(
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > >
> > > Hal
> > >
> >
> > Obviously, I receive any replies....
> >
> > Best --
> >
> > Alberto
> >
> >
|