[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Re[4]: Maxxer and Heresy...MayBeeee



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

agree 110% overturn every stone is one good approach.
 i am with you on that.
a simple sine function aint a cristal ball and aint gonna tell you
tommorrows price. however i might be wrong, i have not overturned
this stone yet...
and about the best model without the use of price, what else is
there to overturn, Mark?  we got volume - been that road, we got cycles
been that road for a short trip, we got some energy fields - did not
want to go that road , we even got "cia mental projection over the pit" -
remote viewing... remember?  been that road... did not project succesfully
:-)
i am certainly not genious nor a guru and i have a very open mind.

common let's go that road... i wanna know about the model. we can take
it, look at it, overturn it and see if it works.
Bilo.


----- Original Message -----
From: Mark Brown <markbrown@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Omega List <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2000 4:37 PM
Subject: Re[4]: Maxxer and Heresy...MayBeeee


> Hello  Bilo,
>
> BS> heresy... ( no personal offence intended )
>
> None   taken   but  hey  take  a chill pill, the guy was just asking a
> question  and was trying to answer it somewhat.  forgive me I have not
> been on this mailing list very long very long and so I'll setback and
> try to learn something  from those with more experience.  I believe to
> ever have an understanding  of  what  it is we all do this business of
> trading.  We must  completely understand all theories and notions
> regardless of how valid  or  invalid they may seem.  Only with this
> solid foundation can we focus on that which is of most significance.
>
> --
> Best regards,
>   Mark Brown   mailto:markbrown@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
> PS  every  stone  must  be  overturned,  to have a proper benchmark. I
> believe  firmly  amplitude has its place. I will to you something else
> the  most  successful model I have ever seen is not use the underlying
> price   itself   to  generate  the  signals  from.  so that may blow a
> hole in allot of people's hard work.
>
>