|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Have you tested this theory?
Have you tried not paying taxes?
Did you get away with it?
Can you cite your court case where you were exonerated and excluded from
paying taxes?
Prove your point by not paying your taxes. If your successful let us know.
Sincerely hope you like being contained against your will.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Lamont Cranston" <strategies@xxxxxxx>
To: <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, April 07, 2000 6:58 PM
Subject: Re:Stop paying taxes
> To All:
>
> The Constitution provides for two types of Taxes; Direct Taxes, which are
> taxes that are paid directly to the Government (which is the way that the
> Government attempts to impose the federal Income Tax) and Indirect Tax,
> which the Constitution refers to as duties, imposts, and excises and which
> must be geographically uniform in order for them to be constitutional.
>
> The founders had just won independence from a tyrannical king and were
> concerned about giving any government too much power including any
> opportunity to impose any kind of direct tax, without apportionment.
> Apportionment means that before the Government can impose any type of
direct
> tax, it first must decide how much money it needs to collect in any given
> year. Then it must apportion the tax among the the various states based
> upon the populations of those states.
>
> In two seperate Supreme Court cases, Pollock v. Farmers Loan and Trust
Co.,
> 157 U.S. 601, and Brushaber v. Union Pacific Railroad, 240 U.S. 1, the
court
> ruled that direct taxes were unconstitutional.
>
> In the 16th Amendment, it states "The Congress shall have power to lay and
> collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without
> apportionment among the several states, and without regard to any census
or
> enumeration." But, the qualifying phrase in this amendment, that denotes
> the fact that it only applies to corporate profits which is the "on
incomes,
> from whatever source derived."
>
> In the IRS code, Section 61 it states that "any person made liable for
any
> tax" must pay said tax. The word "person" is this case means corporation.
> This is what the phrase in the 16th amendment, "income, from whatever
source
> derived", refers to -- corporate profits.
>
> With further research, in reference to that Section 61, and the statement
> that income from whatever source derived is taxable, if further examined
it
> would show that the original source of that statement comes from the 1939
> Tax Code Section 22. The source of the statement comes from Title 26 Part
> 519, which refers to a tax treaty with Canada. In another words, all
income
> from whatever source derived in Canada is taxable.
>
> Just the facts folks, just the facts.
>
> Lamont Cranston
> "who knows what evil lurks"
>
>
>
>
>
>
|