|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
------- Forwarded Message Follows -------
Date sent: Sat, 15 Jan 2000 09:10:57 -0800
From: TSBMI <tsbmi@xxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: (Fwd) Re: Fw: BMI Satellite
To: "'rickinri@xxxxxxx'" <rickinri@xxxxxxx>
Copies to: TSBMI <tsbmi@xxxxxxx>
Dear Client,
Thank you for your Email. You state that client in the lower 48 states are
seeing different times and tick counts many factors will cause this
difference the baud rate your unit is at, reception, your software can all
play factors in this. As for the 2 minute delay you are seeing I am in the
process of looking into it I tend to think that this maybe an issue stemming
from the volatility of the stock market that has had an effect in our data
stream since the first of the year. BMI is on a fixed bandwidth meaning that
regardless of what the situations we only have so much room to fit all of
the data into this bandwidth this may cause back up of data and buffering.
We are currently working on a permanent solution to this issue. Within the
next few weeks we will be revealing a complete detailed plan to our clients
explaining the changes to the data feed.
Thank You,
Daniel A. Pursley
DBC TECH SUPPORT
1.800.436.4036 BMI/1.800.762.7538 DBC Products
> Please visit our website at http://www.dbc.com
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rickinri@xxxxxxx [SMTP:rickinri@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2000 10:45 PM
> To: tsbmi@xxxxxxx; tdbrun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: (Fwd) Re: Fw: BMI Satellite
>
> Daniel A. Pursley
> DBC TECH SUPPORT
> ------- Forwarded Message Follows -------
> Date sent: Wed, 12 Jan 2000 11:36:42 -0600 (CST)
> From: tradejacker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To: Roger Dalton <rogerdalton@xxxxxxxxx>
> Copies to: omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: Fw: BMI Satellite
>
> i'm in texas, and yep, i've got the 38k box.
>
> what i find amazing is that bmi sat subscribers are reporting different
> ticks counts and different time delays across the lower 48 us.
>
> agreed that your 2 min delay is not only a disaster, but ILLEGAL in terms
> of reat time delivery in our contracts.
>
> maybe we should sue bmi to give us the 56k delivery that they promised
> before
> bmi was swallowed up by dbc!!!
>
> TJ
>
> i'm posting this private message because of the general concern over bmi
> shoddy and inconsistent delivery service....we paid for a premium service,
> and damnit to hell, we should get what we pay for
>
> jeff crystal, as a bmi/dbc rep, where the hell are ya??????
>
> At Wed, 12 Jan 2000 08:27:24 -0800 (PST), Roger Dalton
> <rogerdalton@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> >
> >I don't mind 5 second delays, but 2 minutes is
> >disaster. I also just watch CME futures (S&P, Nas,
> >Eminis) and a few indexes. That's it. I was making
> >market orders in the eminis and just getting killed
> >with my fills. Then I found out how delayed I was.
> >
> >You have a 38k satellite receiver box?
> >
> >Where are you located?
>
|