[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: BMI Satellite


  • To: "Omega-List" <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: BMI Satellite
  • From: "Attila Antal" <attila_antal@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2000 08:39:16 -0800
  • In-reply-to: <20000112152312.1656.qmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

Roger, I've switched to DTN last fall. Setup went so so. Their data lags,
sometimes up to minute or so especially during opening and heavy volume.
They are too a bit arrogant about fixing the problem.

Attila

-----Original Message-----
From: omega-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:omega-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx]On
Behalf Of Roger Dalton
Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2000 8:23 AM
To: omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Cc: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: BMI Satellite


I have been a BMI satellite subscriber for the past 4
years and have definitely noticed a performance
difference in the past few months.  I talked to a BMI
tech yesterday and I was very surprised to hear what
he had to say.

He said that this was a known problem (2 min delays)
and that it was a bandwidth problem, that didn't exist
a couple of years ago.  He also said that they had no
intention of fixing the problem.  I could tell that he
was pushing the Esignal (internet feed) side of their
company.  Anyway, I was very pleased that I got an
honest answer.  I have been speaking with DTN about
using their satellite service.

Does anyone use DTN after having used BMI or using
both concurrently.  I would love to hear about the
differences in quoting speed.

Thank you.

Roger