|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
In a message dated 12/17/99 8:37:24 AM Pacific Standard Time,
chrisbak52@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
> I totally agree with that statement for those already running NT 4. For
> example ZDLabs reported that "in tests running the most popular business
> applications" Win2K "is comparable to the performance of Windows NT 4.0 on
> configurations with 64 MB and 128 MB of memory." So the question is for
> NT users, why bother pay $190 per machine upgrade to a legal monopoly for a
> new product that may not deliver much better performance than NT does?
Windows 2000 is NT5. You buy it for the same reasons you buy any version
upgrade
- new features like the Win98 gui, multi-monitor support, etc.
|