PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
There is no reason to construct additional "rules" or protocols for the addition
of new subjects, whether stocks or otherwise, to this list.
There are plenty of other lists which serve those purposes.
There's enough "pollution" on this list already -- and there is no goodly reason
to add more via new topics.
If you want to discuss stocks get on a stock list.
There's enough junk on this list already which everyone has to wade through in
order to find relevant Omega material.
And FWIW criticizing the addition of non-Omega material is not "bashing," it's
just asking that the rules, that everyone agreed to when they subscribed, be
followed.
Richard D. Funkhouser
Ron Augustine wrote:
>
> It's probably not really practical to allow something like this, regardless
> of how worthwhile it might be for those who are interested-- because the
> bashers and do-gooders will continue to pile-on anyone who attempted it, no
> matter how well researched the information or how honorable the intentions
> of the tipster.
>
|