|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Beats me. Actually, I'm inclined to think they won't break em up in any
significant way--partly because there may be no good (workable) way. my only
point re ATT is that MSFT is a screaming buy right now because the parts (if
they can be created) are worth more than the whole. And if it is not broken up
it is as now cheap relative to earnings relative to many other techs and is the
dominant player.
tradejacker@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> possibly, but how would it be broken up? seems to be a hell of a lot more
> integration between the msft divisions than with the att/baby bells or even
> with the "7 sisters" integrated oils.
>
> TJ
>
> not trying to be a smartass, just curious on how it will be done
>
> At Sat, 06 Nov 1999 07:24:07 -0500, Jim Johnson <jejohn@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> >I have heard it reported that owning ATT at the time of breakup and
> >then
> >holding the distributed shares of the baby Bells has out performed the
> >SP500.
> >I see the same potential if MSFT is broken up.
>
|