|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
YES, I AGREE, IT WOULD BE MORE USEFUL THAN THE GRIPES AND REQUESTS FOR HELP.
WHY NOT DO IT.
JERRY R
wong wrote:
> I second both Ron's and Robert's ideas.
>
> With so many experts on the newsgroup(+"s", if we can include the "CL"
> group as well), and with so many following either the stock market indices
> and/or stocks, there should be plenty of discussions about particular stocks.
>
> Since one can't attach gifs on the omega group, perhaps something like that
> will suffice:
>
> "Hi fellows, look at this stock. <Mention name and/or symbol of stock.>
> Look at the 2 year (or 10-year) price history of the stock on a
> daily/weekly/monthly basis. According to these indicators <name them>, it
> seems stock is under accumulation/topping out/.... It will be nice to
> watch the stock on your own for some more time from now on with your own
> indicators/systems for good timing for entry/exit....."
>
> There are plenty of excellent indicators around - e.g., Jurik JMA, Kauffman
> AMAK, Chuck's ATR exit, Sweeney's AME ..., of course some of these are
> proprietory, and may not be openly discussed here without the authors'
> permission (would they allow discussion here? I mean NOT distribution of
> their works on the newsgroup?)
>
> Here there will be serious discussions, not spamming.
>
> And of course, whoever is reading the post should be doing his/her
> homeowork, and arrive at his/her own conclusion... shoulddn't be blaming
> the member mentioning about the stock in case there's a bad trade made
> after reading the post.
>
> I'm sure that's "do-able".
>
> Regards,
>
> Wong
>
> ps: Some of the technical issues we can discuss: is the bull dead? is it
> a bear market now? can we take advantage of the presidential election year?
> how to profit (if at all) from tax-loss selling and January effect? can
> we trade stocks based on seasonality?...
> ============================================================================
> ============
> At 10:04 AM 11/03/99 -1000, Ron Augustine wrote:
> >Not a bad idea, Robert! It would probably be much more useful and
> >productive than 90% of the crap that appears here.
> >
> >But there should be a couple of rules (I'm sure you'd like that :) --
> >
> >Only ONE post allowed about any issue/research/tip, etc. **AND** no
> >follow-up bashing and whining by the do-gooders...
> >______________________________________
> >At 12:38 PM 11/03/1999 -0600, you wrote:
> >>
> >>Suites me lets change the rules. Make this a stock recommendation list
> >>along with being an Omega products list.
|