[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: stock recommendation



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

I second both Ron's and Robert's ideas.

With so many experts on the newsgroup(+"s", if we can include the "CL"
group as well), and with so many following either the stock market indices
and/or stocks, there should be plenty of discussions about particular stocks.

Since one can't attach gifs on the omega group, perhaps something like that
will suffice:

"Hi fellows, look at this stock.  <Mention name and/or symbol of stock.>
Look at the 2 year (or 10-year) price history of the stock on a
daily/weekly/monthly basis.  According to these indicators <name them>, it
seems stock is under accumulation/topping out/....  It will be nice to
watch the stock on your own for some more time from now on with your own
indicators/systems for good timing for entry/exit....."

There are plenty of excellent indicators around - e.g., Jurik JMA, Kauffman
AMAK, Chuck's ATR exit, Sweeney's AME ..., of course some of these are
proprietory, and may not be openly discussed here without the authors'
permission (would they allow discussion here? I mean NOT distribution of
their works on the newsgroup?)

Here there will be serious discussions, not spamming.

And of course, whoever is reading the post should be doing his/her
homeowork, and arrive at his/her own conclusion... shoulddn't be blaming
the member mentioning about the stock in case there's a bad trade made
after reading the post.

I'm sure that's "do-able".


Regards,

Wong

ps:  Some of the technical issues we can discuss: is the bull dead?  is it
a bear market now? can we take advantage of the presidential election year?
 how to profit (if at all) from tax-loss selling and January effect?  can
we trade stocks based on seasonality?...
============================================================================
============
At 10:04 AM 11/03/99 -1000, Ron Augustine wrote:
>Not a bad idea, Robert!  It would probably be much more useful and
>productive than 90% of the crap that appears here.
>    
>But there should be a couple of rules (I'm sure you'd like that :) -- 
>           
>Only ONE post allowed about any issue/research/tip, etc.  **AND** no
>follow-up bashing and whining by the do-gooders...
>______________________________________
>At 12:38 PM 11/03/1999 -0600, you wrote:
>>
>>Suites me lets change the rules. Make this a stock recommendation list
>>along with being an Omega products list.