[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

with GIFs.....(Fwd) Re: whats this FEATURE ?



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

forgot attachements ARGGG.......

------- Forwarded Message Follows -------
Gary wrote: 
> If the exit happens on a bar AFTER the maximum high/low was hit, then the 
> internal trailing stops are (as far as I know anyway) safe. 

maybe - but what means SAFE: that means you have to INSPECT all your  
charts for the backtest when, where (why<g>) it happened. 

I would prefer to RUN THEM and take the results - PERIOD :-) 

PO sent the following privately after I forwarded the whole thread to him - as  
that may shed new light I answer publically: 

PO ecrit: 
> A few questions: 
>  
>  What was the exact day where the signal appeared and the day where it 
>  disappeared ? 

It should be clear by my list mails but here it is again:  
TUESDAY 19th appeared 
WEDNESDAY 20th was gone 

> Can you send me the daily datafile for the SP symbol 

No need besides:  
OHLC 127700 128900 126650 127500, i.e. it closed lower than it opened 
  
> Have you a sig5.dat and sig5.idx file ( or maybe signal5.dat) in the omega 
> /sercver/ sig directory ? 

sure I have - but dont see any need for it - the problem is BOUNCING TICKS -
 the very worst of it that TS has changed a REALTIME trade with hindsight  
after the EOD close ! 

As I said it was set at 10%, changed it as good ole Dennis suggested aka  
workaround (tmŽ ORŽ) to 100% and the EXIT is BACK again were I saw it. 

BTW: the system as per FAKE_TS  (tmŽ ZEBRAŽ) still shows in the old  
entry in the system with BT at 10% set as open trade and has a 23.0 bps  
open profit - nice make up for a trade which already was bailed in REALTIME  
at 16 BPS LOSS !!!!!!!!!! 

> In the Server option have you checked the morning update ? 

yes, obviously it gets triggered there - so with UNchecking this, it MIGHT not  
do the FAKE_UPDATE - still the BT is a major problem for any backtest 

thanks for any insight - especially whether setting the BT to 100% is a SAFE  
guarantee, which I just dont believe...... 

I just did a test of the same system on S&P on EOD data with BT set at 0%  
and BT set at 100% - see attached GIF....... its a HUGHE difference if you  
watch the ROA !!! - and obviously it would be even more different running in  
REALTIME and the worst: I have no clue whether better or worse !!! 

rgds hans 

The following section of this message contains a file attachment
prepared for transmission using the Internet MIME message format.
If you are using Pegasus Mail, or any another MIME-compliant system,
you should be able to save it or view it from within your mailer.
If you cannot, please ask your system administrator for assistance.

   ---- File information -----------
     File:  BTat000.gif
     Date:  23 Oct 1999, 15:56
     Size:  6437 bytes.
     Type:  GIF-image

Attachment Converted: "c:\eudora\attach\BTat000.gif"
The following section of this message contains a file attachment
prepared for transmission using the Internet MIME message format.
If you are using Pegasus Mail, or any another MIME-compliant system,
you should be able to save it or view it from within your mailer.
If you cannot, please ask your system administrator for assistance.

   ---- File information -----------
     File:  BTat100.gif
     Date:  23 Oct 1999, 15:56
     Size:  6282 bytes.
     Type:  GIF-image

Attachment Converted: "c:\eudora\attach\BTat100.gif"