|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
>That time was before Mark Brown orchestrated a series of complaints which
so far as I can see, were and are designed to provide him with customers for
Tradeware.
WRONG, I only considered "HAVING" to do my own product after I got F' ed
over by Omega. Then only after exhausting the possibility of TradeLab did
I set out to produce my own product.
> When Vapour(sorry)Tradeware does emerge, he will be in exactly the same
position as Omega.
WRONG, I trade for a living. That is the sole source of income for TW and
the affiliated companies I'm involved with. They need to sell software, I
on the other hand need software.
> Almost all of the people that try to trade lose their money and stop. So
it is necessary to attract new traders all the time, otherwise no new
trading software will be sold and there will be no money to improve the
existing software.
WRONG, I need the software, I'm the only customer this product really needs.
As long as I make money the product will be better than any software company
could ever produce based on sales of software alone.
> Tradeware will have to try to sell to the same newbies as Tradestation
because there are not enough experienced and profitable traders to give any
kind of a return.
WRONG, I built TW for friends who like myself are involved with professional
money management firms. A market which is starving for a quality product, I
might add. I have a version of TW that cost 50,000.00 a year, two digit
numbers of these are now pre sold NOW. I should just sell this version
only, and leave all other markets alone. However I started somewhere like
everyone else, and so I have budding relationships with many people in this
business. My priorities are to give the medium to power user and the
institutional clients the best service I can. At this time the lowest
priority clients we have are the newbie, who may or may not be here 6 months
from now. In fact ALL the magazines have asked about advertising and
promotion. We or I know most of my potential customers personally, they
are not newbies. We want a few select serious traders who need this
platform. Granted sales will not be brisk, so what?
> If they are really good and really profitable, they move on to better
platforms and better feeds. I don't suppose Soros spends much time trying to
save $15 per month on his data provider and I doubt if he will be a customer
for Tradeware.
WRONG, one London office which is associated (the largest Forex desk in
London) is one of the institutional pre sold's. If you had taken the time
to read the web site real well, you would have noticed that we support ever
major institutional data feed, Bridge, ILX, Reuters, Bloomberg.
> What has been lost is help in making the best of the trading platform I
can afford. Mark Brown has a lot to answer for. Tradeware had better be
good.
WRONG, it better be perfect... and although it may not be when it comes
out, we will address and work towards perfection. Mark Brown
PS In fact WARNING if you are a newbie trader TraderWare is not for you, I
do suggest that you try TS 4 and become proficient with it first. Then if
you last and are still around one day you will better appreciate what I'm
trying to accomplish, with TradeWare.
|