|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Could this be the starting point of some widsom on Omega List?
However, being a solution provider does not give any right or reason to be rigth
better than anyone,or any kind of guarantee to know more than anyone.
There is no Solution Provider serie 3 exam for the moment.
We could be suspected of knowing something to Omega software because we use it
for our own development, but is it really more true than for user lambda ?
I'm not so sure...
In the meantime, it seems that none has yet suspected Omega Man and PO to be the same.
The most difficult thing to me (PO) being to write in low level english in contrast of OM style,
in order to protect my real NY identity and juicy hair dresser business.
Until now, it was a success.
Guess it will continue...
Rgds
PO
Paris, NY.
----- Message d'origine -----
De : Larry Wright <lwright@xxxxxxxxxx>
À : Omega List <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Envoyé : lundi 11 octobre 1999 23:07
Objet : Thoughts for shills...
> It would seem that the latest 'Omega man' thread has brought out many more
> damaging negative messages than would have been here had he not tried to
> 'defend' Omega. I understand his point, and, in a theoretical/technical
> sense, he is right. But IMHO it misses the larger picture, and some of the
> real world.
>
> Perhaps a better approach for shills (or shill-look-alikes) is:
>
> (1) Lister complains about a problem, sometimes even showing some of
> his/her frustration :-). Bound to happen...
>
> (2) Shill trys to address *only* a way to fix the problem, or implement a
> work-around, never mentioning how "Omega can do no wrong."
>
> (3) If shill has no solution, and still feels as though a post is
> necessary, she/he does not post anything suggesting "Omega is..."
>
> I believe PO and others have much knowledge that could help us all if it
> were put in problem-solving messages. Some of these folks are, after all,
> *solution* providers. Besides, the advertising might help them :-).
>
> Or, how about:
>
> (1) in lieu of a problem, the shill could 'talk up' a product by showing
> a better/non-obvious/faster/etc way of doing something that is
> currently being discussed on the list. I realize this could be abused,
> but I'm sure the list folks would speak up about trivial/advertising-only
> messages :-).
>
> Anyone could do this, of course, but if shills restricted their messages
> to these approaches, it might diminish the negative threads that arise
> fairly often. It would seem that 'Omega can do no wrong' does not go over
> well in the face of so many problems...
>
> Your thoughts? Might this improve the list?
>
> Larry
>
>
|