[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Omega Receives GREAT! Reviews



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

Perhaps you could strip out your in-house software and release the real time
charting/quote/news/etc. with the source code. If you open sourced it, then
others
could pick up and enhance adding functionality and programming, etc.

Loki

-----Original Message-----
From: Lawrence Chan <stnahc@xxxxxxxxx>
To: 'omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx' <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thursday, September 30, 1999 4:20 PM
Subject: Re: Omega Receives GREAT! Reviews


>> From: Larry Wright <lwright@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> On Thu, 30 Sep 1999, Lawrence Chan wrote:
>>
>> > why not I have my programmers strip our my in-house software and
>> > release a non-programmable real time charting/quote/news/etc. tool
>>             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>
>> There are basically 2 reasons why I stick with TS:
>> 1. It IS programmable (with an arcane language, but better than nothing)
>> 2. Nice graphics, even though very limited in capability (x set by OR)
>>
>> Leave in the programming...
>>
>
>why no programming?
>because that can be done thru high-end programs like TraderWareX, TradeLab,
>or if one is good at programming, then the UMDS SDK is an excellent choice
>..
>plus - with programming capabilities, I think $99 will not cover the cost,
>probably way more than that.
>
>so, is programming capability necessary?
>maybe, maybe not - depending on whether you know what you are looking for
>:)
>I always say know the stats before talking about system twisting :)
>
>my in-house tools are not programmable - as the most important things are
>wired into the programs already ... must take them out :)
>
>some one also mentioned that asking $99 is too expensive because
>quote.com can do that already ...
>well, I did say free for some basic configuration ... didn't I?
>
>my intention is more bias towards having a basic tool available for more
>people :)
>
>for high-end tools, lets wait for Mark Brown's Traderware :)
>
>