[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Incompatiabillity with Win 98 Second Edition



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

FWIW, I have tried TS2K on two machines: one was a 166 MHz P1, 98 Mb, and
the other was a  350 MHz P2 128 Mb. Both are running W98SE, installed as an
upgrade from W98, which, in turn, was an upgrade from W95.

In both cases, if I recall correctly, at one point the install asked me
something about the files I am installing are older than the current version
on my computer. Do I really want to replace? I answered 'no to all'. In each
case the install completed successfully and TS2K seems to run alright,
although very, very slow on the 166 MHz machine. Power users should note
that I am only collecting about 300 symbols, mostly indices and a few
stocks, in real time (Signal cable).

I have about one lock up and crash per week, which is about the same as what
I had with TS4. Usually happens when I try to open another application -
insufficient resources, I suppose.

In any event, the situation seems tolerable and meets my needs for now.

Clint


----- Original Message -----
From: Paul H. Lasky <phlasky@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <Omega-List@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 1999 9:50 AM
Subject: Incompatiabillity with Win 98 Second Edition


> I was amazed to learn that TS2ki does NOT install on new machines running
> the just-released Windows 98 Second Edition.
>   You must remove or re-name the newly up-graded OBDC.dll 's that
Microsoft
> includes with Win 98 2nd Ed. TS2ki installs its own out-dated (rev. 96-97)
> OBDC.dll's . Maybe thats why TS2ki is so unstable as these dll's handle
the
> access functions for all data.
>
>   Finally after installing TS2ki on my brand new Dell with Win 98 2nd ed
it
> still is unstable even  running just EOD data.
> In fact it is more unstable than running under plain old Win 98.
>
>   Omega's "Quality Assurance" department ( some 18 year old drop-out who
> can't read the manuals?) "assures" me that they consider this a SERIOUS
> problem and will address it with a patch. In fact I think this comment may
> have some truth  since Omega is truly concerned that they can't continue
to
> sell this dog that won't install on Microsoft's new flag-ship product.
>
>
>   Paul Lasky
>