|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
I have had FutureSource here for several years, no real problems, the
best tech support I've ever seen and they support TS for me. As far as
I can tell, having tried Signal twice and using FS, but reading the
"adventures" of other feed users, there are 2 serious ones (FS and CQG)
and a bunch of toys. There is no doubt that FS is more expensive than
the others, and CQG is more expensive than FS. I cannot understand some
of these people, risking tens and hundreds of thousands of dollars all
the time, but wimpy about spending an extra few hundred per month to get
a rock solid data feed.
I see these messages all the time about problems, missing and missed
data. When have you ever seen one from a FS user? That's because FS
puts the intraday data on their website every day, usually about 6 pm
Pacific. Most recent 2 days, 5 days and life of contract. No charge
for this. All the daily data is resent every day, overnight.
Jim Allen
Timothy Morge wrote:
> Omega Users:
>
> Is anyone using anything other than BMI, Signal [or any of
> the DBC feeds], or DTN for real-time data?
>
> I need a solution for a satellite office that will have to
> be served through dedicated phone lines--I am thinking that
> will be either SP Comstock or FutureSource. Anyone using
> thse two that can comment on their plus/minuses?
>> SNIP <<
|