|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
gee, three emails in less then 10 minutes, i really wish you would stop
playing with your email.. whats the matter, your " TD" ( totally dum )
trademarked indicators not telling you to do something... Knyyt
----- Original Message -----
From: Tom DeMark <tomdemark@xxxxxxxx>
To: knyyt <knyyt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 1999 12:09 PM
Subject: Re: truth is the greater imperative
> knytt??? use proper vocab its "drivel" not dribble
> buy a vowel!!!!
>
> knyyt wrote:
> >
> > I liked it better when TD didnt know how to use his email.. now we
gotta
> > listen to his dribble....
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Robert Cummings <robert.cummings@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: Tom DeMark <tomdemark@xxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: <JParris@xxxxxxx>; <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 1999 11:45 AM
> > Subject: Re: truth is the greater imperative
> >
> > > Tom it's one thing to question a post's subject matter yet still
another
> > to
> > > use it as a opportunity to character assassinate the author. I think
what
> > > you said about Ron is truth but what you said a TJ was personal. So
now
> > > when he attacks you I hope you don't blame the list as you have done
in
> > the
> > > past.
> > >
> > > Robert
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > At 08:43 AM 6/22/1999 -0700, Tom DeMark wrote:
> > > >pardon me, but ron has every right to challenge what appear to be
> > > >outrageous complaints as this "writer" is prone to make. i have
observed
> > > >ron's thoughtful and deliberative demeanor on this network for months
> > > >and his contributions have always been impartial and in the best
> > > >interests of the group at large. unfortunately, individuals, such as
the
> > > >"writer", are repeatedly prone to making blanket critical
> > > >generalizations without any supportive documentation, tarnishing
others
> > > >reputations in the process, but, fortunately, demonstrating their
own
> > > >stupidity, biases, and one-sidedness at the same time.
> > > >
> > > >best regards, tom demark
> > > >
> > > >JParris@xxxxxxx wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> This sounds like an argument one might hear between a savvy trader
and
> > an
> > > >> Omega solution provider.
> > > >>
> > > >> Jim
> > > >> _____________________________________
> > > >> TJ wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> >i've seen many traders blow out their accounts after purchasing
or
> > > leasing
> > > >> the
> > > >> >latest system de jour which received positive reviews in
prominent
> > > >> >trade rags such as futures and tasc. newbies, bless their dumb
naive
> > > >> >hearts, actually believe what is written about these systems and
> > > >> >essentially mortgage the farm to throw 5-10k for an curve fit
piece
> > of
> > > >> >fecal matter that explodes when it is traded for any length of
time.
> > > >> >this sad scenario repeats itself year after year
> > > >>
> > > >> I
> > > >> Ron replied:
> > > >>
> > > >> Do you have any objective, verifiable proof that backs-up your
> > statements?
> > > >> If so, would you post some references to it?
> > > >>
> > > >> Otherwise, are members of this forum expected to believe your
claims
> > > just as
> > > >> you would have them reject the claims of others?
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
>
|