[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: truth is the greater imperative



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

Tom it's one thing to question a post's subject matter yet still another to
use it as a opportunity to character assassinate the author. I think what
you said about Ron is truth but what you said a TJ was personal. So now
when he attacks you I hope you don't blame the list as you have done in the
past.

Robert




At 08:43 AM 6/22/1999 -0700, Tom DeMark wrote:
>pardon me, but ron has every right to challenge what appear to be
>outrageous complaints as this "writer" is prone to make. i have observed
>ron's thoughtful and deliberative demeanor on this network for months
>and his contributions have always been impartial and in the best
>interests of the group at large. unfortunately, individuals, such as the
>"writer", are repeatedly prone to making blanket critical 
>generalizations without any supportive documentation, tarnishing others
>reputations  in the process, but, fortunately, demonstrating their own
>stupidity, biases, and one-sidedness at the same time.
>
>best regards, tom demark
>
>JParris@xxxxxxx wrote:
>> 
>> This sounds like an argument one might hear between a savvy trader and an
>> Omega solution provider.
>> 
>> Jim
>> _____________________________________
>>  TJ wrote:
>> 
>>  >i've seen many traders blow out their accounts after purchasing or
leasing
>> the
>>  >latest system de jour which received positive reviews in prominent
>>  >trade rags such as futures and tasc. newbies, bless their dumb naive
>>  >hearts, actually believe what is written about these systems and
>>  >essentially mortgage the farm to throw 5-10k for an curve fit piece of
>>  >fecal matter that explodes when it is traded for any length of time.
>>  >this sad scenario repeats itself year after year
>> 
>>  I
>> Ron replied:
>> 
>>  Do you have any objective, verifiable proof that backs-up your statements?
>>  If so, would you post some references to it?
>> 
>>  Otherwise, are members of this forum expected to believe your claims
just as
>>  you would have them reject the claims of others?
>> 
>> 
>>
>
>