|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Tom it's one thing to question a post's subject matter yet still another to
use it as a opportunity to character assassinate the author. I think what
you said about Ron is truth but what you said a TJ was personal. So now
when he attacks you I hope you don't blame the list as you have done in the
past.
Robert
At 08:43 AM 6/22/1999 -0700, Tom DeMark wrote:
>pardon me, but ron has every right to challenge what appear to be
>outrageous complaints as this "writer" is prone to make. i have observed
>ron's thoughtful and deliberative demeanor on this network for months
>and his contributions have always been impartial and in the best
>interests of the group at large. unfortunately, individuals, such as the
>"writer", are repeatedly prone to making blanket critical
>generalizations without any supportive documentation, tarnishing others
>reputations in the process, but, fortunately, demonstrating their own
>stupidity, biases, and one-sidedness at the same time.
>
>best regards, tom demark
>
>JParris@xxxxxxx wrote:
>>
>> This sounds like an argument one might hear between a savvy trader and an
>> Omega solution provider.
>>
>> Jim
>> _____________________________________
>> TJ wrote:
>>
>> >i've seen many traders blow out their accounts after purchasing or
leasing
>> the
>> >latest system de jour which received positive reviews in prominent
>> >trade rags such as futures and tasc. newbies, bless their dumb naive
>> >hearts, actually believe what is written about these systems and
>> >essentially mortgage the farm to throw 5-10k for an curve fit piece of
>> >fecal matter that explodes when it is traded for any length of time.
>> >this sad scenario repeats itself year after year
>>
>> I
>> Ron replied:
>>
>> Do you have any objective, verifiable proof that backs-up your statements?
>> If so, would you post some references to it?
>>
>> Otherwise, are members of this forum expected to believe your claims
just as
>> you would have them reject the claims of others?
>>
>>
>>
>
>
|