|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Dear Robyn Greene:
Your wordy and detailed reply to the public Omega-List is more an
attempt to justify your inappropriate behavior than an apology. The
matter could have been dispensed with by entering a simple statement
like the subject line of this e-mail. This would have made me a willing
helper in getting you the necessary relief and payment for the wayward
check which obviously got credited to the wrong account, and was never
stolen as you suggested. What thief would steal a check then deposit to
his own account? Think about it. Would that be a smart move? Crooks
may not all be smart, but few are that dumb.
Omega-List readers and visitors may interpret your action as a
"piling on" against a person who may have been perceived as a bad guy.
In reality, so far as the original incident is concerned, I rendered a
regretful apology, but the parties who provoked the action didn't
apologize, nor has Attorney Robyn Green shown any remorse. You have
stated to me more than once, "I'm an Attorney" without apparant
relevance. Is that supposed to mean that apologies can be turned around
into legal vulnerability, and that lawyers are exempt from apologies?
Big deal--so what! To me and in my experiece, saying you are an
attorney won't cut you any advantage at all. Exactly what did you
suppose that was going to get for you? What is wrong with the old
fashioned approach of simply saying, "I'm sorry" when you screw up? It
actually works- Try it, you may improve your image.
Regards,
Bob Pelletier.
Robyn Greene wrote:
> Earlier this year (late February or early March) - Bob Pelletier (from
>
> CSI data) and I agreed that CSI would pay a sum of money for a
> database
> I had. This database was compiled in part by me, and in part by a
> technical analyst named John Yurko, who is now deceased. I sent Mr.
> Pelletier the data. I requested that the amount in question be sent
> to
> the minor son of Mr. Yurko, James Yurko, in care of his mother.
>
> In early May, Mr. Pelletier told me that he had directed the
> comptroller
> of his firm to issue the check. I called Mrs. Yurko about a month
> later, and she told me that she had not received the check. A while
> later, I posted a message on this board which said that Mrs. Yurko had
>
> not received the check.
>
> Mr. Pelletier read my message, and wrote me that he had in fact mailed
>
> the check and that it had been cashed. He faxed me a copy of a check
> payable to James Yurko. The back side of the faxed check isn't very
> legible. But it shows that the check 1) was not endorsed; and 2) it
> had
> been cashed. I then spoke with Mrs. Yurko again. She said that she
> hadn't received the check and that it was her practice to endorse
> checks
> by hand. She also told me that she hadn't received some of the mail
> she
> should have received in May, and she gave me the name of her bank.
>
> I have no reason to believe that Mr. Pelletier and Mrs. Yurko aren't
> telling the truth. At this point, based on the information I have, it
>
> looks like the check was sent, but stolen and cashed. I have given
> Mr.
> Pelletier the information regarding Mrs. Yurko's bank account which he
>
> may need to find out what happened to his check, and to recover the
> proceeds if they were indeed stolen. I hope that he lets me know what
>
> happened to the check after he finishes his investigation. Since a
> bank
> investigation may take a while, I wanted to bring this information to
> the attention of the list where I posted my message, so list members
> will not draw any unwarranted conclusions about CSI data or Mr.
> Pelletier from my previous message. Robyn Greene
|