[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: LEARNING



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links


A lawyer!  Ye Gods!  Lucky I didn't step on you.  I've even gone out of my
way to crush parasites in the past.

Do you mind my asking:  Have you ever produced anything?  Or do you strictly
leech off value producers?


(Nice company TJ.  You all should get together:  you, Mark Down, and the
leech.)




----- Original Message -----
From: Robyn Greene <greene@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: The Omega Man <editorial@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: omega list <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 1999 9:34 PM
Subject: Re: LEARNING


> The Omega Man wrote:
>
> > Ah, Robyn!  But your time is your most valuable asset!  You didn't spend
the
> > money so you paid more dearly for your knowledge than you had to!  You
paid
> > with part of your life!
>
> I'm a lawyer - so you don't have to tell me that time is money.  OTOH -
since
> time is money - one can ill afford wasting it exploring every "market
miracle"
> piece of hype that's out there - whether it's in the form of software -
books -
> courses - videos - etc. - etc.  Which is not to say that there isn't some
decent
> stuff out there.  It's just not the kind of stuff that promises to make
you rich
> in a couple of months.  Only way you can do that is by becoming a lawyer
and
> getting a $5 million verdict your first time out <g>.
>
> FWIW - I especially hate lousy software - because - while I can easily
conclude
> that a book - course - video - indicator - whatever - is nonsense in a
couple of
> hours - it usually takes a pretty long time to learn enough about a new
> complicated piece of software to conclude with a reasonable degree of
certainty
> that it's no good (or good).
>
> Also FWIW - since I don't know you - I'm a long time user of SuperCharts
(back
> to 1993).  It's a very good stable piece of software IMO (I've used it
with
> Windows 3.1, Windows 95 and Windows 98 - on everything from a 386 to a
fairly
> current Pentium II) - it does everything I need - and - if it were Y2K
compliant
> - I'd probably stick with it for another decade and forget about reading
the
> software "reviews" on this list.  Robyn
>
>