|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Note that Phil limited his recommendation to those being COMPENSATED for
their "advice" and that would exclude forums and lists such as this one. I
agree with this. Should medical and legal practitioners, for example, also
be free of any registration or licensing requirements?
Carroll Slemaker
-----Original Message-----
From: Dtrader <dan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Omega List <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sunday, May 09, 1999 8:39 AM
Subject: Re: CFTC Case Update
>I'll tell you "why the hell NOT."
>
>Are you familiar with the little concept known as "freedom of speech" ??
>
>It has faR more significance in our daily lives than your petty gripes
>concerning talking heads and scam artist hucksters.
>
>Think in big, macro terms. not little ones.
>
>_________________
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Phil Lane <accumulator@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>To: omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
>Date: Sunday, May 09, 1999 11:27 AM
>Subject: CFTC Case Update
>
>
>
>:I don't know about armchair investors and their mailing lists, but in my
>:opinion ANYONE accepting compensation for their "advise" or "market
>:opinion" "indicators" or "miracle trading system" should DEFINITELY be
>:required to pass the test and gain their registration. Why the hell NOT?
>
|