|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
List members,
I may be stupid, I may not have sophisticated systems like yours, but I am
not experiencing the same problems...
I have loaded charts with a lot more than 13,000 bars . YHOO, 10 tick chart,
10 days back, 32,000 ticks a day. Am I doing this correctly? Plotting
indicators was easy once data was up. Took around 20 seconds to display
chart. Am I missing something?
275 tests in an optimization of a simple stoch system, real-time data, 10
tick bars, Industrial average, 10 days back took around 6 minutes.
People, I think it has a lot to do with your configuration. I am not a very
sophisticated TS user, my systems are very simple. If there is anything that
I can test for you, time for you, let me know.
Hope this helps,
Shay Horowitz
www.teamzeus.com
----- Original Message -----
From: Kevin Hewitt <kevii@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Alan Courchene <positionsize@xxxxxxxxx>; Omega list
<omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Zeus <zeus4@xxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, April 08, 1999 4:57 PM
Subject: Re: TS2k, no problems yet
> On Friday, 09 April, 1999 4:51 Alan Courchene wrote:
> > Ive done everything EXCEPT cut my symbols down to
> > a number like 67. Including installing NT 4.0 sp3 and
> > sp4 (Tried both)and it still runs like a dog with its
> > legs cut off.
>
> My experience is that TS2000i runs like a dead dog with ONE symbol and
> OFFLINE! AMD K6-2/300, 128MB, W98.
>
> For example, identical optimisation runs took 1 minute on TS4 and 4
minutes
> on TS2000i. Has anyone else made similar comparisons?
>
> Loading a chart with more than the old limit of 13,000 bars can take
> forever.
>
> Kevin.
>
>
>
|