[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: TS2000 Speed



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

I ran chart scanner (or assistant manager or whatever it is called now) on
15,000 symbols. I aborted after 5 hours and it was only 2/3 of the way done.
Sucks!

This chart scanner also took a leap backwards in that it no longer shows
what it is doing.

Glen

-----Original Message-----
From: Kevin Hewitt <kevii@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Omega List <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Saturday, March 27, 1999 6:18 PM
Subject: TS2000 Speed


>Has anyone compared the speed of TS2000 with TS4?
>
>I just did an 11 test optimisation of a simple system on the same 8 trading
>days of 24 hour tick data and it took 60 seconds on TS4 and 4 minutes(!) on
>TS2000.
>
>My machine is an AMD K2-300 with 128mb RAM and Windows 98.  The system was
>freshly transferred to TS2000 and the system was automatically built.  I
>changed nothing but it showed 25% more trades and lower profit than on TS4.
>I ran both tests with only one version loaded at a time and the Servers
>offline.
>
>I had 8 days of data in TS4 but needed to load 11 days in TS2000 to get the
>same date range - does TS2000 count calendar days while TS4 counts days of
>data?
>
>Even so, the speed of TS2000 is extremely disappointing.  Everything seems
>to run like molasses compared to TS4.
>
>BTW, I have the MS-Office 2000 beta loaded.  I moved all the OBDC files in
>windows/system to a save folder before re-installing TS2000 and it worked.
>I then had to copy a few of them back to get TS4 to work again.
>
>Anyone else unhappy with relative speed?
>
>Kevin Hewitt
>Brisbane Australia
>
>
>