|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Mike
for the OBTW catagory - ole' Mr Lollypopers is at again .......did
anodder' rocket launch vs da mets ! ....
- was only 450' - hell.....anybody can do dat--->right !
hm......every time i hit dose monkey-pops - shatter on me ..... probably
why
i'm NOT playin n' he be <grin>
the best,
fletch
----- Original Message -----
From: Mike <mreed@xxxxxxx>
To: fletch <fletchmo@xxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 1999 8:52 PM
Subject: Re: tick
>bill,
>
>hey, no problem here -- really! I think this comment from today is what
>tossed me off base...
>
>"ya peeked my inrterest re last nights close numbas outside the range -
>other
>things follow to ......"
>
>... because we didn't do that. so, i just wanted to be sure tthat your
>calculations/understanding of how they =can= be used were right.
>
>sooo, settle down, not gonna ream ya, no way no how. why should i?
>
>now... really must call it a night. and tomorrow night, it may be
networking
>time...
>
>best,
>Mike
>
>
>>i'll send some gif of your ss - later - but do not even thiink there is a
>>problem - what gave you that idea to begin with - now my vagueness on
>top
>>of the other crossed thread perhaps - what other explanation is left on
>>your end ? ....this otta be good <grin>
>>
>>there's gonna be hell to pay - and i wanna make damn straight not on the
>>receivin end of it !
>>
>>rgds
>>
>>bill
>>
>>----- Original Message -----
>>From: Mike <mreed@xxxxxxx>
>>To: fletch <fletchmo@xxxxxxxx>
>>Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 1999 7:47 PM
>>Subject: Re: tick
>>
>>
>>>Bill,
>>>
>>>Whew, I thought that we were running in to a spread sheet problem, or I
>>>needed to give more explaination. Glad we're straight on that.
>>>
>>>Data feed- Still dunno. DTN, for my use, may or may not be the
>alternative.
>>>
>>>You ready for some basketball!!?? Next to the W.S. this is the best - in
>>>this state anyhow...
>>>
>>>best,
>>>Mike
>>>
>>>>see - i 'm not paying attn to the right numbas here
>>>>
>>>>Data feed
>>>>that is why crux brothers got ya by the balls - (no offense intended
>>>here) -
>>>>if you know anybody using Future Source as well /
>>>>TS5 works w/ them as well - FWIW
>>>>
>>>>all i know is the sooner this re-worked DOSS/win 3.1 program is shelved
>>the
>>>>better ! Just too damn many weird occurances going on - and BMI is cut
>>>>loose / the better - not even going to go into what happened last yr
for
>>>>three mnths w/ the feed
>>>>
>>>>rgds
>>>>
>>>>bill
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>----- Original Message -----
>>>>From: Mike <mreed@xxxxxxx>
>>>>To: fletch <fletchmo@xxxxxxxx>
>>>>Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 1999 6:21 PM
>>>>Subject: Re: tick
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>bill,
>>>>>
>>>>>for clarification sake here. the upper bband was penetrated on the 5th
>>and
>>>>>8th, however the 3d thrust did not get to +.50 or higher. like said,
>this
>>>>>thing is not as good at tops as it is at bottoms, and i usually like to
>>>see
>>>>>them =both= at extremes. sometimes vc alone is ok, just not as good of
>>>>odds.
>>>>>so, here are the readings i have on these from the 5th through
today....
>>>>>
>>>>>Date, mid-band, top band, botom band, 3d thrust
>>>>>MAR5,99 1.18 1.59 0.77 1.87 0.40
>>>>>MAR8,99 1.22 1.67 0.76 1.76 0.47
>>>>>MAR9,99 1.24 1.70 0.78 1.56 0.21
>>>>>MAR10,99 1.28 1.73 0.83 1.57 0.05
>>>>>
>>>>>so as you can see, VC was above the top band the 5th and 8th, however
>the
>>>>3d
>>>>>thrust didn't get to that +.50 or higher. now..... we clear on this
side
>>>of
>>>>>the equasion now? Please?? <grin> hey, new stuff isn't learned
>overnight,
>>>>so
>>>>>there are =no= dumb questions... got me?
>>>>>
>>>>>re DTN- contract w/ BMI is up this month. thinking quickly, may just do
>>>the
>>>>>switcheroo. half the cost... makes me wonder how slow and/or how many
>>>>trades
>>>>>are not reported re the spoos... and everything else for that matter.
>>>>>
>>>>>best,
>>>>>Mike
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>numbas are damn near identical - some difference in the
>>>>>>advance/deccline issues - of sorts -
>>>>>>not enough to break rank !!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Yahoo crap here for the EOD numbas in the sheet - where we goin w/
>>>>>>this - something has got you jazed -
>>>>>>& it's not particulary this - was not sure before what you were talkin
>>>>>>about "specifically" - still not exactly sure -
>>>>>>
>>>>>>yes .... noticed some goof-ball numbas - not unusual /
>>>>>>still not "Clear ' here w/ " your " below - statement if the 3d
>>>>>>thrust was ok - - how did you know it was outside the range - what did
>>>>>>you do to compensate for this ?????
>>>>>>
>>>>>>scalping ops' from the floor with BMI quotes is getting damn
>>>>>>impossible to do when things speed-up -
>>>>>>last expy was prime example once again -
>>>>>>
>>>>>>the split at BMI said the other day - pushing real hard for internet
>>>>>>access quotes vs sat/cable - i have no bid/ask on ops - well there @
>>>>>>the prior posted price - no good - no trade vol on any of anything re
>>>>>>indexes/options etc -
>>>>>>would seriously be thinking about Futuresource or DTN - BMI is a
>>>>>>wounded-duck - on borrowed time !
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>rgds
>>>>>>
>>>>>>bill "log-lumper" g
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Mike wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> bill, no! the numbers were =not= outside of the range last night!!
>>>>>>> vc was the two prior days, but not as of last night and =not= w/ the
>>>>>>> 3d thrust ob. just so ya know... here's my data (wsj figs) for the
>>>>>>> last few weeks to check against yours...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> FEB22,99 1962 1063 565744 122633
>>>>>> FEB23,99 1273 1724 337952 398419
>>>>>> FEB24,99 1236 1795 265644 479896
>>>>>> FEB25,99 1062 1966 234020 472989
>>>>>> FEB26,99 1467 1511 303815 428696
>>>>>> MAR1,99 1413 1600 310840 350079
>>>>>> MAR2,99 1433 1555 319944 399255
>>>>>> MAR3,99 1322 1654 350709 365107
>>>>>> MAR4,99 1725 1198 512811 231197
>>>>>> MAR5,99 2079 927 644253 148636
>>>>>> MAR8,99 1372 1631 390970 288806
>>>>>> MAR9,99 1367 1674 329593 440770
>>>>>>> date, na, nd, nva, nvd
>>>>>>> best,
>>>>>>> Mike
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>> From: fletch <fletchmo@xxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>> To: Mike <mreed@xxxxxxx>
>>>>>>> Date: Wednesday, March 10, 1999 2:30 PM
>>>>>>> Subject: Re: tick
>>>>>>> yes sir ! .....
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ya peeked my inrterest re last nights close numbas outside
>>>>>>> the range - other
>>>>>>> things follow to ......
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> rgds
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> bill
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Mike wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> > bill,
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > you been observing the tick w/ the bbands... for
>>>>>>> entry/exit... or intraday
>>>>>>> > scalps? not a bad s.t. tool w/ other stuff, esp scalping
>>>>>>> off floor, imho...
>>>>>>> > need to be quick most times however.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > best,
>>>>>>> > Mike
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
|